Skip to main content
Citation Index • Supreme Court

Cases Citing Section 83

Statute: Indian Evidence Act, 1872 (IEA)

Archana Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 285Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1412 of 2020 ====================================================== Archana Kumari Wife of Sri Pawan Kumar Singh, Resident of Village- Jagdishpur, P.O. and P.S.- Jagdishpur, District- West Champaran at Bettiah. ... ... Petiti...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →

Mufasil, District- Begusarai, Presently residing at C/O Bhushan Jee, Sakuntala Kunj, Subhakarmana Colony, East Laxminagar, P.S. - Ramkrishna Nagar, Patna presently posted as Dresser in O.T. - 4, Patna Medical College Hospital, Patna. 7.Ajay Kumar Son of Suryabansh Singh presently residing at C/o, M...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Jagdeo Das v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 305Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

217-02-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The petitioner apprehends arrest in connection with Complaint Case No. 645C/2020, instituted for the offence punishable under Sections 323, 417, 406, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code. 3. The allegation against...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Nagendra Chaubey v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 446Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.839 of 2024 ====================================================== Nagendra Chaubey S/o Sri Sukh ram Chaubey Resident of village-Hirpur, Post-Dalupur District-Buxar. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1.The State of Bihar through th...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →

a sand stone statue of Lord Budha having 70 ft height in Bhumi Sparsh posture, on the platform of a height of 30 ft. The learned counsel submitted that as per the Agreement, 30 ft high platform was to be constructed first and thereon the statue of Lord Budha was to be installed. As such, ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Upendra Kumar v. Ashok Rai

undefined INSC 853Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

construction over the suit property and parties were directed to maintain status quo without hearing the defendant/petitioner. No notice was issued as is reflected from the copy of the order sheet Patna High Court C.Misc. No.57 of 2024 dt.02-02-2024 2/4 attached with the present petition. ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Deepak Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 894Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

Yadav. 3. As per the prosecution story, the informant alleged that he came to know about the killing of his brother and named the accused persons on suspicion that they have killed his brother. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the informant is not an eye-witness and on suspicion t...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Jyoti Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 236Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

question of fact with regard the date of the marriage of the petitioner, which otherwise also, can not be determined without taking evidences. 9. So far the post of Aganwadi Sevika is concerned, it is a post created under the scheme and not holding any civil post, thus no prot...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →

of Prasad Bhawan, East Ram Krishna Nagar, Patna, presently posted as Dresser in O.T.- 1, Patna Medical College and Hospital, Patna. 18.Putul Kumari D/o Ramadhar Manjhi resident of Telpa House, Bhawar Pokhar, Vijay Gopal Banarge Path, P.S.- Pirbahore, District- Patna, presently posted as Dresser in ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Manohar Lal v. State

undefined INSC 896Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

Biharsharif, Nalanda, where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Excise P.S. Case No. 766 of 2023, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. aditi/- (Satyavrat Verma, J) U T...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
← Previous PagePage 4Next Page →