Skip to main content
Citation Index • Supreme Court

Cases Citing Section 83

Statute: Indian Evidence Act, 1872 (IEA)

Kapil Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 400Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.4171 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-447 Year-2023 Thana- GURUA District- Gaya ====================================================== Kapil Paswan S/O Late Rameshar Paswan R/O Village- Habipur, P.S- Gurua, Distt.-GAYA. ... ... ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Chandradeo Mandal v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 446Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.4 of 2023 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6909 of 2022 ====================================================== Chandradeo Mandal, Son of Dukhi Mandal, resident of Village- Khagor, P.S.- Kiul, District- Lakhisarai. ... ......

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Kapil Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 193Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

fulfillment of dowry demand. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is innocent and he has falsely been implicated in the present case. It is further submitted that petitioner is father-in-law of the deceased and he has no concern with the mess a...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →

come under the purview of superstructure, as mentioned in Section 2(k) of the Act, 2008. 12. The Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of M/s Brahmaputra Infrastructure Ltd. (supra), after referring Sections 8, 9 and 22 of the Act 2008 has held in paragraph-5 of the said...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Mithlesh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 473Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

No. 163 of 2023 registered for the offence under Sections 394/395/412 of the Indian Penal Code and under Section 25 (1-b)A, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act. 3. As per the prosecution case, the allegation against four unknown miscreants is that they assaulted the informant and looted a cas...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Jagdeo Das v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 809Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

from petitioner and Rs. 13 lacs was paid to the petitioner by the complainant in different installments. It is alleged that thereafter neither the money was returned nor the sale deed was executed. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.5489 of 2024(2) dt.17-02-2024 2/3 4. Learned counsel for the petitione...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Rajesh Tewari v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 684Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

its auction, certain procedure were required to be drawn by the competent authority like Mechanical Engineer or Automobile Engineer. Such person has to access the vehicle in the manner known to the Patna High Court CWJC No.1022 of 2021 dt.09-12-2024 5/12 law under the Motor Vehicles Act read with ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Gajendra Thakur v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 845Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

1408, 14th Floor, D.B. Ozone Beside Thakur Mall, Near Dahisar Check Naka, Mira Road, P.S. - Kashimira, East Thane Mumbai (401107) 4.Gyan Ranjan Thakur @ Anshu Thakur Son Of Gajendra Thakur Resident Of Village - Rupolia, Panchkadi, P.S. - Dhaka, District - Motihari, At Present Flat No .- 1408, 14th ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Babloo Kumar v. The State Of Bihar Bihar

undefined INSC 581Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

and Excise Act. 3. As per the prosecution case, total 10.2 litres of illicit Nepali liquor was recovered from the sack which was kept on the motorcycle and the said vehicle was being driven by the co-accused, Shiv Shankar who disclosed the name of the petitioner. 4. Learned counsel for the petitio...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Jyoti Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 488Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

of fact with regard the date of the marriage, the same ought not to be considered while exercising the writ jurisdiction. The petitioner has always been at liberty to approach before the Civil Court of competent jurisdiction to settle the disputed question of fact. 8. This Court has heard the lea...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
← Previous PagePage 3Next Page →