Skip to main content
Citation Index • Supreme Court

Cases Citing Section 30

Statute: Indian Evidence Act, 1872 (IEA)

Md. Afaque Ansari v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 347Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.11360 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-92 Year-2023 Thana- KOTHI District- Gaya ====================================================== 1.Md. Afaque Ansari @ Afak Ansari @ Bechan Miyan @ Md. Afak Ansari S/O Rafique Ansari R/O Villa...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Gajendra Thakur v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 320Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

1408, 14th Floor, D.B. Ozone Beside Thakur Mall, Near Dahisar Check Naka, Mira Road, P.S. - Kashimira, East Thane Mumbai (401107) 4.Gyan Ranjan Thakur @ Anshu Thakur Son Of Gajendra Thakur Resident Of Village - Rupolia, Panchkadi, P.S. - Dhaka, District - Motihari, At Present Flat No .- 1408, 14th ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Upendra Kumar v. Ashok Rai

undefined INSC 219Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

68% Match

दी द एव फ दी स वा बितू त क क स वा स्थि ब वववा ब दत जमदी न पर हलो रह क ब नमर्मा ण कवा यर्य कवा फ लोटलो ग्रवा फ दवा ब खिल ब कयवा गयवा और ब नव क दन ब कयवा गयवा ब क मददवा लहन मदकदमवा कदी जवा नकवा रदी क क Patna High Court C.Misc. No.57 of 2024 dt.02-02-2024 3/4 बिवावजतू न्यवा यवा लय नहदी आकर ब वववा ब...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Raushan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 688Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

68% Match

35 of the Arms Act. 3. Prosecution case, in short, is that police on secret information raided the place where the accused persons were trying to commit dacoity. Seeing the police party the accused persons tried to flee away but some of the accused persons, including this petitioner, were a...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Jyoti Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 836Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

68% Match

appointment letter and in his place, the respondent no. 8 was selected as Aganwadi Sevika. 4. On the other hand, the respondent no. 8 obtained only 58.60 % marks, much less than the petitioner, who obtained 76% marks, nonetheless her case was placed for consideration and, as such,...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →

any of its works relating to construction, repairs or maintenance of any building or superstructure, dam, weir, canal, reservoir, tank, lake, road all types of bridge, culvert, factory or work shops or of such other work of the State Government or, as the case may be, of the public ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →

the Bihar State Tourism Development Corporation (Annexure-5). Thereafter, an agreement was entered into between the parties on 29 th August, 2013. The consideration money was fixed as Rs.17.37 crores, Patna High Court C.R. No.12 of 2021(11) dt.12-01-2024 3/10 as per Clause 5 of the agreement. The ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Bharat Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 118Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

68% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.11542 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-264 Year-2022 Thana- FOREST (GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL) District- Jamui ====================================================== 1.Bharat Yadav Son of Ganesh Yadav R/o vill - Baijala, P.S. - Jhajha,...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Jyoti Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 625Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

68% Match

the Bidhyapati Mandir, Samastipur, where the marriage was solemnised categorically demonstrates that the marriage of the petitioner with Ajeet Kumar Aryan was solemnised before the cut off date and as Patna High Court CWJC No.426 of 2022 dt.26-11-2024 4/8 such non-selection of the petitioner by tr...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Deepak Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 563Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

68% Match

Yadav. 3. As per the prosecution story, the informant alleged that he came to know about the killing of his brother and named the accused persons on suspicion that they have killed his brother. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the informant is not an eye-witness and on suspicion t...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
← Previous PagePage 4Next Page →