Cases Citing Section 30
Statute: Indian Evidence Act, 1872 (IEA)
undefined INSC 773 • Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)
under sections 307, 379, 323, 324, 341, 504 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code to which section 302 of the Indian Penal Code was added subsequently. 3. As per the prosecution case, the accused persons including the petitioner herein are said to have come variously armed with lathi, farsa etc. It is st...
Read Full Judgment Analysis →undefined INSC 378 • Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)
Mr. Ajay Mukherjee, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and Mr. Pramod Kumar Pandey, learned APP appearing on behalf of the State. 2. The petitioners apprehends their arrest in connection with Katoriya P.S. Case No. 257 of 2020 registered under Sections 341, 323, 307, 504, 506, 3...
Read Full Judgment Analysis →2013 2 SCC 1 • Supreme Court of India
FACTS: Petition seeking action for police failure to register an FIR for kidnapping. Held: Registration of FIR is mandatory under Section 154 CrPC (now Section 173 BNSS) if the information discloses a cognizable offence. Ratio: No preliminary inquiry is permitted if cognizable offence is disclosed; ...
Read Full Judgment Analysis →undefined INSC 773 • Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)
but a ‘superstructure’ erected/installed on the platform of 30 ft height and the statue encompasses the word ‘superstructure’ mentioned in Section 2(k) of the Act 2008. The learned counsel next Patna High Court C.R. No.12 of 2021(11) dt.12-01-2024 5/10 submitted that, as per Clause 5(ii) of the Ag...
Read Full Judgment Analysis →undefined INSC 593 • Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Letters Patent Appeal No.3 of 2022 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10685 of 2019 ====================================================== Vinni Kumari presently residing at Bhawar Pokhar, Behind Khetan Market, P.S. - Pirbahore, district- Patna, Posted as Dre...
Read Full Judgment Analysis →undefined INSC 645 • Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)
both sides. The paranasal sinuses and mastoid air cells are normally developed, clear and pneumatized. The orbital contents are unremarkable. 8. As per the doctor’s opinion, injuries are grievous in nature, which are caused by a hard and blunt substance. The age of the petitioner is 18 years. There...
Read Full Judgment Analysis →undefined INSC 629 • Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)
No. 163 of 2023 registered for the offence under Sections 394/395/412 of the Indian Penal Code and under Section 25 (1-b)A, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act. 3. As per the prosecution case, the allegation against four unknown miscreants is that they assaulted the informant and looted a cas...
Read Full Judgment Analysis →undefined INSC 658 • Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)
Sections 25(1-b), 26, 27 and 35 of the Arms Act, Sections 3, 4 and 5 of the Explosive Substance Act and Sections 16, 18 and 20 of the UPA Act. 3.Considering the nature of allegation as alleged in the FIR, the Court is not inclined to release the petitioner on bail in connection with Dumariya P.S. C...
Read Full Judgment Analysis →undefined INSC 823 • Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.789 of 2018 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.22349 of 2012 ====================================================== 1.The Union Of India through Secretary Cum D.G., department of Post, Bhawan, New Delhi. 2.The Assistant Dire...
Read Full Judgment Analysis →undefined INSC 228 • Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.11360 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-92 Year-2023 Thana- KOTHI District- Gaya ====================================================== 1.Md. Afaque Ansari @ Afak Ansari @ Bechan Miyan @ Md. Afak Ansari S/O Rafique Ansari R/O Villa...
Read Full Judgment Analysis →