Skip to main content
Citation Index • Supreme Court

Cases Citing Section 267

Statute: Constitution of India (Constitution)

Shahida Khatoon v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 424Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

70% Match

of the petition. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State. The petitioners have filed the instant application for grant of regular bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 302, 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Allegation against the petitio...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Sahabuddin Ansari v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 296Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

70% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1759 of 2024 ====================================================== Sahabuddin Ansari @ Shahabuddin Ansari Son of Yakuf Ansari, Resident of Dalpatpur, Police Station- Maharajganj, District- Siwan. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Shahida Khatoon v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 745Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

instant application for grant of regular bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 302, 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Allegation against the petitioners is that over a Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.3899 of 2024(3) dt.21-03-2024 2/3 petty dispute, they began to abuse a...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
The Union Of India v. Lalan Kumar

undefined INSC 560Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.789 of 2018 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.22349 of 2012 ====================================================== 1.The Union Of India through Secretary Cum D.G., department of Post, Bhawan, New Delhi. 2.The Assistant Dire...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Kumar Pushpak v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 856Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

: (In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 4141 of 2024) For the Petitioner/s: Mr. Nishant Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s: Mr. Harendra Prasad, APP (In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 7123 of 2024) For the Petitioner/s: Mr. Prince Kumar Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s: Mr. Abhay Kumar, A...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Lalita Kumari v. Government of UP (2013) 2 SCC 1

2013 2 SCC 1Supreme Court of India

69% Match

FACTS: Petition seeking action for police failure to register an FIR for kidnapping. Held: Registration of FIR is mandatory under Section 154 CrPC (now Section 173 BNSS) if the information discloses a cognizable offence. Ratio: No preliminary inquiry is permitted if cognizable offence is disclosed; ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →

any of its works relating to construction, repairs or maintenance of any building or superstructure, dam, weir, canal, reservoir, tank, lake, road all types of bridge, culvert, factory or work shops or of such other work of the State Government or, as the case may be, of the public ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Kaushal Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 785Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

by which the petitioner has been dismissed from the service and further to reinstate him in service with all consequential benefits. 3.Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the final Patna High Court CWJC No.2681 of 2019 dt.12-02-2024 2/3 order of punishment has been passed by the order ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Md. Arshad v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 817Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Beur P.S. Case No. 366 of 2023 subject to the following conditions: (I) One of the bailors shall be own/close member of the family of the petitioner. (II) The petitioner sh...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Shahida Khatoon v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 185Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

have no criminal antecedent. Learned APP appearing for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for Bail. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the facts and Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.3899 of 2024(3) dt.21-03-2024 3/3 circumstances of the case as well as...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
← Previous PagePage 3Next Page →