Skip to main content
Citation Index • Supreme Court

Cases Citing Section 267

Statute: Constitution of India (Constitution)

Manohar Lal v. State

undefined INSC 364Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

70% Match

Biharsharif, Nalanda, where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Excise P.S. Case No. 766 of 2023, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. aditi/- (Satyavrat Verma, J) U T...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Archana Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 869Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

70% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1412 of 2020 ====================================================== Archana Kumari Wife of Sri Pawan Kumar Singh, Resident of Village- Jagdishpur, P.O. and P.S.- Jagdishpur, District- West Champaran at Bettiah. ... ... Petiti...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Arpan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 519Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

70% Match

506, 379, 365, 364(A) of the Indian Penal Code read with section 141 of the Railways Act. 3. As per the prosecution case, the FIR has been lodged against the petitioner and other 10-11 unknown accused persons against whom there is an allegation that they have kidnapped the passenger from the runnin...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Manish Kumar Mahto v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 108Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

70% Match

under sections 307, 379, 323, 324, 341, 504 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code to which section 302 of the Indian Penal Code was added subsequently. 3. As per the prosecution case, the accused persons including the petitioner herein are said to have come variously armed with lathi, farsa etc. It is st...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Shahida Khatoon v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 187Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

70% Match

of the petition. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State. The petitioners have filed the instant application for grant of regular bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 302, 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Allegation against the petitio...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Shahida Khatoon v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 501Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

instant application for grant of regular bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 302, 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Allegation against the petitioners is that over a Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.3899 of 2024(3) dt.21-03-2024 2/3 petty dispute, they began to abuse a...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Kumar Pushpak v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 393Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

: (In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 4141 of 2024) For the Petitioner/s: Mr. Nishant Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s: Mr. Harendra Prasad, APP (In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 7123 of 2024) For the Petitioner/s: Mr. Prince Kumar Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s: Mr. Abhay Kumar, A...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Lalita Kumari v. Government of UP (2013) 2 SCC 1

2013 2 SCC 1Supreme Court of India

69% Match

FACTS: Petition seeking action for police failure to register an FIR for kidnapping. Held: Registration of FIR is mandatory under Section 154 CrPC (now Section 173 BNSS) if the information discloses a cognizable offence. Ratio: No preliminary inquiry is permitted if cognizable offence is disclosed; ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Md. Arshad v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 139Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Beur P.S. Case No. 366 of 2023 subject to the following conditions: (I) One of the bailors shall be own/close member of the family of the petitioner. (II) The petitioner sh...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Shahida Khatoon v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 849Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

have no criminal antecedent. Learned APP appearing for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for Bail. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the facts and Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.3899 of 2024(3) dt.21-03-2024 3/3 circumstances of the case as well as...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
← Previous PagePage 2Next Page →