Where any document, purporting or proved to be thirty years old, is produced from any custody which the Court in the particular case considers proper, the Court may presume that the signature and every other part of such document, which purports to be in the handwriting of any particular person, is in that person’s handwriting, and, in the case of a document executed or attested, that it was duly executed and attested by the persons by whom it purports to be executed and attested.
भारतीय साक्ष्य अधिनियम, 1872 (IEA)
धारा 90
Presumption as to documents thirty years old
Englishहिंदी
⏳
हिंदी अनुवाद जल्द आ रहा है
इस धारा का प्रमाणित हिंदी अनुवाद और कानूनी स्पष्टीकरण वर्तमान में तैयार किया जा रहा है। आप तब तक मूल अंग्रेज़ी पाठ देख सकते हैं।
अंग्रेज़ी में देखें (View in English) →मूल वैधानिक पाठ (Original English Text)
Statutory Content of Section 90
Indian StandardSection 90, Indian Evidence Act, 1872
Bluebook (21st ed.)Indian Evidence Act, 1872, § 90 (India)
Court Pleading StandardSection 90 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872
Canonical Web linkhttps://nyaya.cloud/acts/indian-evidence-act-1872/90
Embed this Section Card
Want to display this Section explanation card on your website? Copy and paste the HTML code below:
ऐतिहासिक अदालती निर्णय
धारा 90 से संबंधित महत्वपूर्ण फैसले
सामान्यतः साथ में उद्धृत