The court may, in its discretion, grant relief in any case where it appears to the court that the contract has been obtained by fraud or coercion, or that the defendant has been guilty of gross misconduct in the performance of the contract. The court may, in its discretion, refuse to grant relief in any case where it appears to the court that the contract has been entered into in good faith and that the defendant has not been guilty of gross misconduct in the performance of the contract.
Specific Relief Act, 1963
Section 35
Power to grant relief in certain cases.
Englishहिंदी
⚡ Quick Answer Reference: Section 35 Specific Relief Act, 1963
- Provision: Section 35 of Specific Relief Act, 1963
- Act: Specific Relief Act, 1963
- Classification: civil
- Jurisdiction: India
Statutory Content
What does Section 35 of Specific Relief Act, 1963 say?
Indian StandardSection 35, Specific Relief Act, 1963
Bluebook (21st ed.)Specific Relief Act, 1963, § 35 (India)
Court Pleading StandardSection 35 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963
Canonical Web linkhttps://nyaya.cloud/acts/specific-relief-act-1963/35
Embed this Section Card
Want to display this Section explanation card on your website? Copy and paste the HTML code below:
Source: Gazette of India (Official Publication)Verify egazette.gov.in ↗
People Also Ask (PAA)
Common Questions about Section 35 Specific Relief Act, 1963
What is Section 35 of Specific Relief Act, 1963?
Section 35 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 (Specific Relief Act, 1963) defines and regulates "Power to grant relief in certain cases.". The section states: The court may, in its discretion, grant relief in any case where it appears to the court that the contract has been obtained by fraud or coercion, or that the defendant has been gu...
Landmark Case Laws
Landmark Judgments under Section 35 Specific Relief Act, 1963
Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)
Commonly Cited Alongside
Sections commonly cited alongside Section 35
Contextual Workflows
Recommended AI Workstation Tools
Related Concepts
reliefcontractfraudcoerciongross misconduct