Skip to main content
Citation Index • Supreme Court

Cases Citing Section 20

Statute: Registration Act, 1908 (registration-act-1908)

The Union Of India v. Lalan Kumar

undefined INSC 540Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.789 of 2018 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.22349 of 2012 ====================================================== 1.The Union Of India through Secretary Cum D.G., department of Post, Bhawan, New Delhi. 2.The Assistant Dire...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Ajmal Hussain v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 893Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

ORDER 612-08-2024Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. Despite valid service of notice, nobody appears on behalf of the Opposite Party No. 2. 3. The petitioner apprehends arrest in a complaint case registered for the offences punishable und...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →

parties ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s: Mr. S.D.Sanjay,Sr. Advodate Mr. Mohit Agarwal Mr. Rahul Kumar Mr.Vishal Kumar Ms. Priya Gupta For the State Mr. Nalin Vilochan Tiwary, AC to GA 9 For BSTDCL Mr. Kumar A...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Suresh Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 727Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

Mr. Ajay Mukherjee, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and Mr. Pramod Kumar Pandey, learned APP appearing on behalf of the State. 2. The petitioners apprehends their arrest in connection with Katoriya P.S. Case No. 257 of 2020 registered under Sections 341, 323, 307, 504, 506, 3...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Jyoti Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 386Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

128 of 2019 by the Collector, Samstipur whereby he allowed the appeal preferred by the respondent no. 8 and set aside the order dated 19.01.2019 passed by the District Programme Officer, Samastipur in Patna High Court CWJC No.426 of 2022 dt.26-11-2024 2/8 Aganwadi Case No. 178 of 2018 and upheld t...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Jyoti Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 359Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

question of fact with regard the date of the marriage of the petitioner, which otherwise also, can not be determined without taking evidences. 9. So far the post of Aganwadi Sevika is concerned, it is a post created under the scheme and not holding any civil post, thus no prot...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Shahbaj Kuraishi Md. Sharif Quraishi v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 745Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.5311 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-70 Year-2017 Thana- MEHSI District- East Champaran ====================================================== 1.Shahbaj Kuraishi Md. Sharif Quraishi @ Sudhan Quraishi Village – Chaklahi P.S.- Mehs...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Sheo Charan Dalmia v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 237Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

petition so that the matter could be taken to its logical conclusion. 6. Learned State counsel as also learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Gaya Municipal Corporation do not have any objection. Patna High Court CWJC No.729 of 2024(2) dt.25-04-2024 4/5 8. Paragraphs 17 to 20 of the petition a...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Rajesh Tewari v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 159Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1022 of 2021 ====================================================== Rajesh Tewari Son of Srinath Tiwari Resident of 3, Dilkhush Street, Opposite Circus Avenue S.O. Circus Avenue, Kolkata, West Bengal-700017. ... ... Petitione...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Sheo Charan Dalmia v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 296Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

and the petitioners are allowed to approach the appropriate authority with fresh petition so that the matter could be taken to its logical conclusion. 6. Learned State counsel as also learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Gaya Municipal Corporation do not have any objection....

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
← Previous PagePage 4Next Page →