Skip to main content
Citation Index • Supreme Court

Cases Citing Section 1

Statute: Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC)

Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India (1978) 1 SCC 248

1978 1 SCC 248Supreme Court of India

70% Match

FACTS: Petitioner's passport was impounded without giving reasons. Held: Article 21 procedure must be 'just, fair, and reasonable', not arbitrary or oppressive. Ratio: Expanded Article 21 scope, introducing substantive due process principles into Indian jurisprudence....

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Sheo Charan Dalmia v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 345Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

70% Match

Resident of Mohalla Dalmia House Dhami Tola, K P Road, P.S. Kotwali, Gaya District Gaya that Petitioner no. 1is Presently residing at-402, Smundra Gaurav, Worli Sea Face, Worli Colony, P.S.-Worli, Mumbai, Maharashtra 4.Sheo Arun Dalmia Son of Late Vishwanath Dalmia @ Bishwanath Laxm...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Kumar Pushpak v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 398Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

70% Match

: (In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 4141 of 2024) For the Petitioner/s: Mr. Nishant Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s: Mr. Harendra Prasad, APP (In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 7123 of 2024) For the Petitioner/s: Mr. Prince Kumar Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s: Mr. Abhay Kumar, A...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Ajmal Hussain v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 830Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

70% Match

Sections 323, 354 and 498A of the Indian Penal Code. 4. Allegation against the petitioner is of matrimonial cruelty and of demand of dowry. 5. It is submitted on behalf of petitioner that petitioner Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.5652 of 2024(6) dt.12-08-2024 2/3 happens to be husband of the compla...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Pintu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 696Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

70% Match

recovery of one country made pistol and one live cartridges from the possession of the petitioner. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is innocent and he has falsely been implicated in this case. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petit...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Mukesh Kumar Mandal v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 124Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL REVISION No.148 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.- Year-0 Thana- District- Munger ====================================================== Mukesh Kumar Mandal @ Mukesh Mandal, Son of Raj Kumar Mandal, Resident of Village- Lal Darwaza, P.S.- Kotwali, ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Archana Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 558Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1412 of 2020 ====================================================== Archana Kumari Wife of Sri Pawan Kumar Singh, Resident of Village- Jagdishpur, P.O. and P.S.- Jagdishpur, District- West Champaran at Bettiah. ... ... Petiti...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Bharat Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 736Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.11542 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-264 Year-2022 Thana- FOREST (GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL) District- Jamui ====================================================== 1.Bharat Yadav Son of Ganesh Yadav R/o vill - Baijala, P.S. - Jhajha,...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Lalita Kumari v. Government of UP (2013) 2 SCC 1

2013 2 SCC 1Supreme Court of India

69% Match

FACTS: Petition seeking action for police failure to register an FIR for kidnapping. Held: Registration of FIR is mandatory under Section 154 CrPC (now Section 173 BNSS) if the information discloses a cognizable offence. Ratio: No preliminary inquiry is permitted if cognizable offence is disclosed; ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Pandit Namo Narayan Jha v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 649Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

today, be enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court concerned, Purnea in connection with Sadar (Muffasil) P.S Case No. 640 of 2023, subject to conditions as laid d...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
← Previous PagePage 4Next Page →