Skip to main content
Citation Index • Supreme Court

Cases Citing Section 1

Statute: Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC)

Ramji Mahto v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 373Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

70% Match

counsel appearing on behalf of appellants and learned Spl. Public Prosecutor for the State. 2. This appeal has been filed against the order dated 19.10.2023 passed by learned Special Judge, SC/ST Act, Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.249 of 2024(3) dt.12-09-2024 2/2 Motihari, East Champaran in con...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Md. Afaque Ansari v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 324Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

70% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.11360 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-92 Year-2023 Thana- KOTHI District- Gaya ====================================================== 1.Md. Afaque Ansari @ Afak Ansari @ Bechan Miyan @ Md. Afak Ansari S/O Rafique Ansari R/O Villa...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Letters Patent Appeal No.3 of 2022 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10685 of 2019 ====================================================== Vinni Kumari presently residing at Bhawar Pokhar, Behind Khetan Market, P.S. - Pirbahore, district- Patna, Posted as Dre...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Ramji Mahto v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 380Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

70% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.249 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-380 Year-2018 Thana- GHORASAHAN District- East Champaran ====================================================== 1.Ramji Mahto Son Of Jai Mangal Mahto Resident Of Village - Mahdeva, P.S. - Ghorasa...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Sanjay Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 146Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

70% Match

the offences under Sections 414 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 8/20 (b) (ii) (B) of the Narcotic Drug & Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985. 3. As per prosecution case, total 6 Kgs. Ganja wrapped in a polythene bag along with a theft motorcycle were recovered from the possession of the petition...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Shahbaj Kuraishi Md. Sharif Quraishi v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 596Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

70% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.5311 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-70 Year-2017 Thana- MEHSI District- East Champaran ====================================================== 1.Shahbaj Kuraishi Md. Sharif Quraishi @ Sudhan Quraishi Village – Chaklahi P.S.- Mehs...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Sheo Charan Dalmia v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 864Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

70% Match

Resident of Mohalla Dalmia House Dhami Tola, K P Road, P.S. Kotwali, Gaya District Gaya that Petitioner no. 1is Presently residing at-402, Smundra Gaurav, Worli Sea Face, Worli Colony, P.S.-Worli, Mumbai, Maharashtra 4.Sheo Arun Dalmia Son of Late Vishwanath Dalmia @ Bishwanath Laxm...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Kumar Pushpak v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 617Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

70% Match

: (In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 4141 of 2024) For the Petitioner/s: Mr. Nishant Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s: Mr. Harendra Prasad, APP (In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 7123 of 2024) For the Petitioner/s: Mr. Prince Kumar Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s: Mr. Abhay Kumar, A...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Ajmal Hussain v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 263Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

70% Match

Sections 323, 354 and 498A of the Indian Penal Code. 4. Allegation against the petitioner is of matrimonial cruelty and of demand of dowry. 5. It is submitted on behalf of petitioner that petitioner Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.5652 of 2024(6) dt.12-08-2024 2/3 happens to be husband of the compla...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Pintu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 826Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

70% Match

recovery of one country made pistol and one live cartridges from the possession of the petitioner. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is innocent and he has falsely been implicated in this case. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petit...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
← Previous PagePage 3Next Page →