Skip to main content
Citation Index • Supreme Court

Cases Citing Section 84

Statute: Indian Evidence Act, 1872 (IEA)

Mufasil, District- Begusarai, Presently residing at C/O Bhushan Jee, Sakuntala Kunj, Subhakarmana Colony, East Laxminagar, P.S. - Ramkrishna Nagar, Patna presently posted as Dresser in O.T. - 4, Patna Medical College Hospital, Patna. 7.Ajay Kumar Son of Suryabansh Singh presently residing at C/o, M...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Shahbaj Kuraishi Md. Sharif Quraishi v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 416Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.5311 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-70 Year-2017 Thana- MEHSI District- East Champaran ====================================================== 1.Shahbaj Kuraishi Md. Sharif Quraishi @ Sudhan Quraishi Village – Chaklahi P.S.- Mehs...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Md. Nakib Alam v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 134Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

Bakhtiyarpur (Baluahat O.P) P.S Case No. 29 of 2017 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 406, 420, 120(B), 506/34 of the I.P.C. 3. As per prosecution case, there is allegation that as per direction of Government, the informant, who is PACS Mangager, made agreement on 10.06.2015 wit...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Rajesh Tewari v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 768Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

Brajesh Kumar @ Brajesh Kumar Pandey, Son of Shailendra Kumar Pandey, Resident of Mohalla-Bagmali, P.S.-Town Hajipur, District-Vaishali-844101. ... ... Petitioner. Versus 1.The State of Bihar through the Secretary, Excise Department, Bihar, Patna. 2.The Excise Commissioner, Bihar, Patna. 3.The Dist...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Manohar Lal v. State

undefined INSC 406Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has antecedent of one case and allegation is of recovery of 277 liter of liquor from a Truck. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was not arrested from t...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Rajesh Tewari v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 766Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

have alleged to be created one for the purpose of claiming the dues of the petitioner. In this regard, no material has been placed on record. Moreover, due to avoiding these type of disputed issues like diary of the vehicle as on the date of seizure of the vehicle and its auction, certain procedure...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Jyoti Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 150Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

deems it fit and proper to refer to a judgment rendered by the learned Division Bench of this Court in the case of Babita Kumari v. The State of Bihar and others, reported in 2016 SCC Online Pat 9434, paragraphs no. 7 and 8 whereof are reproduced herein below:- “7. Having considered t...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Jyoti Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 124Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

appointment letter and in his place, the respondent no. 8 was selected as Aganwadi Sevika. 4. On the other hand, the respondent no. 8 obtained only 58.60 % marks, much less than the petitioner, who obtained 76% marks, nonetheless her case was placed for consideration and, as such,...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →

come under the purview of superstructure, as mentioned in Section 2(k) of the Act, 2008. 12. The Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of M/s Brahmaputra Infrastructure Ltd. (supra), after referring Sections 8, 9 and 22 of the Act 2008 has held in paragraph-5 of the said...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Shakti Agarwal v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 306Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

figured in this case during the investigation as call has been made from the mobile of informant's brother-in-law and it has also come that the said mobile was in the possession of the petitioner. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No. 5501 of 2024(2) dt.07-02-2024 2/3 5. Counsel submits that petitioner i...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
← Previous PagePage 4Next Page →