Skip to main content
Citation Index • Supreme Court

Cases Citing Section 82

Statute: Indian Evidence Act, 1872 (IEA)

Rajesh Tewari v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 772Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

its auction, certain procedure were required to be drawn by the competent authority like Mechanical Engineer or Automobile Engineer. Such person has to access the vehicle in the manner known to the Patna High Court CWJC No.1022 of 2021 dt.09-12-2024 5/12 law under the Motor Vehicles Act read with ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar (2014) 8 SCC 273

2014 8 SCC 273Supreme Court of India

69% Match

FACTS: Anticipatory bail application in a Section 498A IPC cruelty case. Held: Arrest should not be the default action in offences carrying punishment of less than 7 years. Ratio: Police must comply with Section 41A CrPC (now Section 35 BNSS) notice guidelines before executing arrest....

Read Full Judgment Analysis →

come under the purview of superstructure, as mentioned in Section 2(k) of the Act, 2008. 12. The Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of M/s Brahmaputra Infrastructure Ltd. (supra), after referring Sections 8, 9 and 22 of the Act 2008 has held in paragraph-5 of the said...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Manohar Lal v. State

undefined INSC 146Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

Biharsharif, Nalanda, where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Excise P.S. Case No. 766 of 2023, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. aditi/- (Satyavrat Verma, J) U T...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Deepak Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 893Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

Yadav. 3. As per the prosecution story, the informant alleged that he came to know about the killing of his brother and named the accused persons on suspicion that they have killed his brother. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the informant is not an eye-witness and on suspicion t...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Ajmal Hussain v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 163Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

ORDER 612-08-2024Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. Despite valid service of notice, nobody appears on behalf of the Opposite Party No. 2. 3. The petitioner apprehends arrest in a complaint case registered for the offences punishable und...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Bharat Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 197Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.11542 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-264 Year-2022 Thana- FOREST (GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL) District- Jamui ====================================================== 1.Bharat Yadav Son of Ganesh Yadav R/o vill - Baijala, P.S. - Jhajha,...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Kapil Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 358Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.4171 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-447 Year-2023 Thana- GURUA District- Gaya ====================================================== Kapil Paswan S/O Late Rameshar Paswan R/O Village- Habipur, P.S- Gurua, Distt.-GAYA. ... ... ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Bharat Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 438Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 222-02-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence under Section 33(1) / 66 of the Indian Forest (Bihar Amendment 1989) Ac...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Kapil Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 366Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

fulfillment of dowry demand. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is innocent and he has falsely been implicated in the present case. It is further submitted that petitioner is father-in-law of the deceased and he has no concern with the mess a...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
← Previous PagePage 2Next Page →