Cases Citing Section 76
Statute: Indian Evidence Act, 1872 (IEA)
undefined INSC 451 • Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)
Mr. Ajay Mukherjee, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and Mr. Pramod Kumar Pandey, learned APP appearing on behalf of the State. 2. The petitioners apprehends their arrest in connection with Katoriya P.S. Case No. 257 of 2020 registered under Sections 341, 323, 307, 504, 506, 3...
Read Full Judgment Analysis →undefined INSC 787 • Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)
and Excise Act, 2018. 3. As per prosecution case, there was alleged recovery of 820.800 liters foreign liquor from Mahindra Pick-up van in question. The petitioner was alleged to be driver of the said vehicle and apprehended on the spot. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petition...
Read Full Judgment Analysis →undefined INSC 581 • Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)
driven by the co-accused, Shiv Shankar who disclosed the name of the petitioner. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.3777 of 2024(2) dt.12-02-2024 2/3 this case. The petitioner has no c...
Read Full Judgment Analysis →undefined INSC 574 • Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)
Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has antecedent of one case and allegation is of recovery of 277 liter of liquor from a Truck. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was not arrested from t...
Read Full Judgment Analysis →undefined INSC 546 • Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)
and Excise Act. 3. As per the prosecution case, total 10.2 litres of illicit Nepali liquor was recovered from the sack which was kept on the motorcycle and the said vehicle was being driven by the co-accused, Shiv Shankar who disclosed the name of the petitioner. 4. Learned counsel for the petitio...
Read Full Judgment Analysis →undefined INSC 527 • Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)
506, 379, 365, 364(A) of the Indian Penal Code read with section 141 of the Railways Act. 3. As per the prosecution case, the FIR has been lodged against the petitioner and other 10-11 unknown accused persons against whom there is an allegation that they have kidnapped the passenger from the runnin...
Read Full Judgment Analysis →undefined INSC 890 • Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)
petitioner as well as learned APP for the State. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner after some argument seeks permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application. 3. Permission is accorded. 4. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application is dismissed as withdrawn. Prakash Narayan (Sa...
Read Full Judgment Analysis →2017 10 SCC 1 • Supreme Court of India
FACTS: Challenged Aadhaar biometrics scheme as violating privacy. Held: Right to Privacy is a fundamental right guaranteed under Articles 14, 19, and 21 of the Constitution of India. Ratio: Privacy is intrinsic to life and personal liberty, subject to proportionality tests for state restrictions....
Read Full Judgment Analysis →undefined INSC 144 • Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)
Bakhtiyarpur (Baluahat O.P) P.S Case No. 29 of 2017 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 406, 420, 120(B), 506/34 of the I.P.C. 3. As per prosecution case, there is allegation that as per direction of Government, the informant, who is PACS Mangager, made agreement on 10.06.2015 wit...
Read Full Judgment Analysis →undefined INSC 493 • Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)
u/s 30(a), 37(c) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. 3. As per the prosecution case, total 9 litres of country made liquor was recovered from the possession of co-accused Diwakar Kumar. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely be...
Read Full Judgment Analysis →