Skip to main content
Citation Index • Supreme Court

Cases Citing Section 72

Statute: Indian Evidence Act, 1872 (IEA)

come under the purview of superstructure, as mentioned in Section 2(k) of the Act, 2008. 12. The Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of M/s Brahmaputra Infrastructure Ltd. (supra), after referring Sections 8, 9 and 22 of the Act 2008 has held in paragraph-5 of the said...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Rajesh Tewari v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 564Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1022 of 2021 ====================================================== Rajesh Tewari Son of Srinath Tiwari Resident of 3, Dilkhush Street, Opposite Circus Avenue S.O. Circus Avenue, Kolkata, West Bengal-700017. ... ... Petitione...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Santosh Kumar Sahu v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 425Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

tried to forcibly evict the informant from the land in which his buffaloes were grazing and the informant was taking care of that land as caretaker on behalf of some other person. When the informant Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6504 of 2024(2) dt.20-02-2024 2/3 opposed his eviction, the p...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →

a sand stone statue of Lord Budha having 70 ft height in Bhumi Sparsh posture, on the platform of a height of 30 ft. The learned counsel submitted that as per the Agreement, 30 ft high platform was to be constructed first and thereon the statue of Lord Budha was to be installed. As such, ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →

of Prasad Bhawan, East Ram Krishna Nagar, Patna, presently posted as Dresser in O.T.- 1, Patna Medical College and Hospital, Patna. 18.Putul Kumari D/o Ramadhar Manjhi resident of Telpa House, Bhawar Pokhar, Vijay Gopal Banarge Path, P.S.- Pirbahore, District- Patna, presently posted as Dresser in ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Deepak Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 403Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

Yadav. 3. As per the prosecution story, the informant alleged that he came to know about the killing of his brother and named the accused persons on suspicion that they have killed his brother. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the informant is not an eye-witness and on suspicion t...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Kamlesh Sahni v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 483Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

committing robbery involving snatching / loot of cash, as such, I am not inclined to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the application stands rejected. praful/- (Anil Kumar Sinha, J) U T...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Amrendra Singh v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 863Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

petitioner as well as learned APP for the State. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner after some argument seeks permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application. 3. Permission is accorded. 4. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application is dismissed as withdrawn. Prakash Narayan (Sa...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Chandradeo Mandal v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 250Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.4 of 2023 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6909 of 2022 ====================================================== Chandradeo Mandal, Son of Dukhi Mandal, resident of Village- Khagor, P.S.- Kiul, District- Lakhisarai. ... ......

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Jyoti Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 520Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

of fact with regard the date of the marriage, the same ought not to be considered while exercising the writ jurisdiction. The petitioner has always been at liberty to approach before the Civil Court of competent jurisdiction to settle the disputed question of fact. 8. This Court has heard the lea...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
← Previous PagePage 3Next Page →