Skip to main content
Citation Index • Supreme Court

Cases Citing Section 48

Statute: Indian Evidence Act, 1872 (IEA)

Manish Kumar Mahto v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 307Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

under sections 307, 379, 323, 324, 341, 504 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code to which section 302 of the Indian Penal Code was added subsequently. 3. As per the prosecution case, the accused persons including the petitioner herein are said to have come variously armed with lathi, farsa etc. It is st...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Shahbaj Kuraishi Md. Sharif Quraishi v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 608Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.5311 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-70 Year-2017 Thana- MEHSI District- East Champaran ====================================================== 1.Shahbaj Kuraishi Md. Sharif Quraishi @ Sudhan Quraishi Village – Chaklahi P.S.- Mehs...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Pujan Thakur v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 188Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4489 of 2021 ====================================================== Pujan Thakur Son of Late Nawal Kishor Thakur, resident of Village- Parihar, Sonapatti, Ward No. 10, P.S. Parihar, Distt. - Sitamarhi (Bihar) - 843324. ... ......

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Deepak Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 654Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

Yadav. 3. As per the prosecution story, the informant alleged that he came to know about the killing of his brother and named the accused persons on suspicion that they have killed his brother. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the informant is not an eye-witness and on suspicion t...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Santosh Kumar Sahu v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 148Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

are only scratch marks over front and sides of the neck, which falsifies the prosecution story about the informant being assaulted by the petitioners. The petitioners have got no criminal history. 05. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail. 06. Having regard to the fa...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Rajesh Tewari v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 162Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

Brajesh Kumar @ Brajesh Kumar Pandey, Son of Shailendra Kumar Pandey, Resident of Mohalla-Bagmali, P.S.-Town Hajipur, District-Vaishali-844101. ... ... Petitioner. Versus 1.The State of Bihar through the Secretary, Excise Department, Bihar, Patna. 2.The Excise Commissioner, Bihar, Patna. 3.The Dist...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →

a sand stone statue of Lord Budha having 70 ft height in Bhumi Sparsh posture, on the platform of a height of 30 ft. The learned counsel submitted that as per the Agreement, 30 ft high platform was to be constructed first and thereon the statue of Lord Budha was to be installed. As such, ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Bharat Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 638Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 222-02-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence under Section 33(1) / 66 of the Indian Forest (Bihar Amendment 1989) Ac...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Letters Patent Appeal No.3 of 2022 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10685 of 2019 ====================================================== Vinni Kumari presently residing at Bhawar Pokhar, Behind Khetan Market, P.S. - Pirbahore, district- Patna, Posted as Dre...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Chhotu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 815Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

u/s 30(a), 37(c) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. 3. As per the prosecution case, total 9 litres of country made liquor was recovered from the possession of co-accused Diwakar Kumar. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely be...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
← Previous PagePage 4Next Page →