Any party to a suit or other proceeding may show that any judgment, order or decree which is relevant under sections 40, 41 or 42 and which has been proved by the adverse party, was delivered by a Court not competent to deliver it, or was obtained by fraud or collusion.
Indian Evidence Act, 1872
Section 44
Fraud or collusion in obtaining judgment, or incompetency of Court, may be proved
⚡ Quick Answer Reference: Section 44 IEA
- Provision: Section 44 of IEA
- Act: Indian Evidence Act, 1872
- Classification: evidence
- Jurisdiction: India
- Summary: This section allows a party to a suit to prove that a judgment, order, or decree was delivered by an incompetent court or obtained through fraud or collusion.
What does Section 44 of IEA say?
Embed this Section Card
Want to display this Section explanation card on your website? Copy and paste the HTML code below:
What does Section 44 of IEA mean?
Plain English Explanation
This section allows a party to a suit to prove that a judgment, order, or decree was delivered by an incompetent court or obtained through fraud or collusion.
Practical Interpretation
In practice, this section operates by enabling parties to challenge the validity of judgments, orders, or decrees that may have been improperly obtained, ensuring fairness and justice in legal proceedings.
Core Legal Purpose
The core purpose of this section is to prevent the misuse of judicial processes and ensure that judgments are based on legitimate and lawful grounds, thereby upholding the integrity of the legal system.
- •The judgment, order, or decree must be relevant under sections 40, 41, or 42.
- •The party must prove that the judgment, order, or decree was delivered by a court not competent to deliver it, or was obtained by fraud or collusion.
- •The key legal test is whether the court was competent to deliver the judgment, order, or decree, and whether fraud or collusion was involved in obtaining it.
- •The key exception is that this section only applies to judgments, orders, or decrees that have been proved by the adverse party.
Practical Example of Section 44 IEA
For example, Rajesh, a defendant in a civil suit, discovers that the plaintiff, Priya, had bribed the judge to obtain a favorable judgment. Rajesh can use this section to challenge the judgment, proving that it was obtained through fraud and collusion, and thereby rendering it invalid.
Frequently Asked Questions about Section 44 IEA
Q: What is the punishment or consequence under Section 44 of IEA?
This section is a procedural provision and does not prescribe a penal punishment.
Q: Does this section apply to private individuals or public entities?
This section applies to any party to a suit or other proceeding, which can include both private individuals and public entities.
Q: Is an offence under this section bailable or cognizable?
This section is not related to criminal offences, and therefore, the concepts of bailable or cognizable do not apply.
Common Questions about Section 44 IEA
What is Section 44 of IEA?
Section 44 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 (IEA) defines and regulates "Fraud or collusion in obtaining judgment, or incompetency of Court, may be proved". In plain terms: This section allows a party to a suit to prove that a judgment, order, or decree was delivered by an incompetent court or obtained through fraud or collusion.
What are the elements of Section 44 of IEA?
The essential elements of Section 44 of IEA are: The judgment, order, or decree must be relevant under sections 40, 41, or 42.; The party must prove that the judgment, order, or decree was delivered by a court not competent to deliver it, or was obtained by fraud or collusion.; The key legal test is whether the court was competent to deliver the judgment, order, or decree, and whether fraud or collusion was involved in obtaining it..
Landmark Judgments under Section 44 IEA
Sections commonly cited alongside Section 44
Ask Nyaya AI About Section 44
Select a pre-configured prompt to run this section through the grounded research engine.