Skip to main content
Citation Index • Supreme Court

Cases Citing Section 35

Statute: Indian Evidence Act, 1872 (IEA)

Deepak Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 208Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

70% Match

Yadav. 3. As per the prosecution story, the informant alleged that he came to know about the killing of his brother and named the accused persons on suspicion that they have killed his brother. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the informant is not an eye-witness and on suspicion t...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →

Pramod Sah presently residing at C/o Bachchu Rajak, Mohalla- Mahendru, Near Malariya Office, P.S.- Sultanganj, District- Patna, presently posted as Dresser in the Department of Surgical I.C.U. Patna Medical College and Hospital, Patna. 12.Pushpa Rani W/o Purushottam Das presently residing at - C/o ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Sharwan Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 581Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

70% Match

Sections 25(1-b), 26, 27 and 35 of the Arms Act, Sections 3, 4 and 5 of the Explosive Substance Act and Sections 16, 18 and 20 of the UPA Act. 3.Considering the nature of allegation as alleged in the FIR, the Court is not inclined to release the petitioner on bail in connection with Dumariya P.S. C...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Amrendra Singh v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 633Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

70% Match

petitioner as well as learned APP for the State. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner after some argument seeks permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application. 3. Permission is accorded. 4. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application is dismissed as withdrawn. Prakash Narayan (Sa...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Manish Kumar Mahto v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 517Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

under sections 307, 379, 323, 324, 341, 504 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code to which section 302 of the Indian Penal Code was added subsequently. 3. As per the prosecution case, the accused persons including the petitioner herein are said to have come variously armed with lathi, farsa etc. It is st...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Raushan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 496Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

35 of the Arms Act. 3. Prosecution case, in short, is that police on secret information raided the place where the accused persons were trying to commit dacoity. Seeing the police party the accused persons tried to flee away but some of the accused persons, including this petitioner, were a...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Jyoti Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 527Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

deems it fit and proper to refer to a judgment rendered by the learned Division Bench of this Court in the case of Babita Kumari v. The State of Bihar and others, reported in 2016 SCC Online Pat 9434, paragraphs no. 7 and 8 whereof are reproduced herein below:- “7. Having considered t...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Ajmal Hussain v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 599Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

ORDER 612-08-2024Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. Despite valid service of notice, nobody appears on behalf of the Opposite Party No. 2. 3. The petitioner apprehends arrest in a complaint case registered for the offences punishable und...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Chhotu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 383Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

u/s 30(a), 37(c) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. 3. As per the prosecution case, total 9 litres of country made liquor was recovered from the possession of co-accused Diwakar Kumar. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely be...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Arpan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 138Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

506, 379, 365, 364(A) of the Indian Penal Code read with section 141 of the Railways Act. 3. As per the prosecution case, the FIR has been lodged against the petitioner and other 10-11 unknown accused persons against whom there is an allegation that they have kidnapped the passenger from the runnin...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
← Previous PagePage 2Next Page →