Indian Evidence Act, 1872

Section 22A

When oral admission as to contents of electronic records are relevant

⚡ Quick Answer Reference: Section 22A IEA

Provision: Section 22A of IEA
Act: Indian Evidence Act, 1872
Classification: evidence
Jurisdiction: India
Summary: This section states that oral admissions about the contents of electronic records are not relevant unless the authenticity of the electronic record produced is in question. This means that if someone makes a statement about what's in an email or text message, that statement can't be used as evidence unless the person who produced the email or text message is being questioned about its authenticity.

Statutory Content

What does Section 22A of IEA say?

Oral admissions as to the contents of electronic records are not relevant, unless the genuineness of the electronic record produced is in question.

Indian StandardSection 22A, Indian Evidence Act, 1872

Bluebook (21st ed.)Indian Evidence Act, 1872, § 22A (India)

Court Pleading StandardSection 22A of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872

Canonical Web linkhttps://nyaya.cloud/acts/indian-evidence-act-1872/22a

Embed this Section Card

Want to display this Section explanation card on your website? Copy and paste the HTML code below:

<iframe src="https://nyaya.cloud/api/widget/section?act=indian-evidence-act-1872&sec=22a" width="100%" height="250" style="border:none; border-radius:8px;"></iframe>

Source: Gazette of India (Official Publication)Verify egazette.gov.in ↗

✓ VERIFIED FOR LEGAL ACCURACYReviewed & certified by Advocate Meera Reddy (Bar Council ID: AP/2910/2019).

AI Educational GuideAI-generated explanation for educational and research purposes. Original statutory text is preserved exactly.

Section Meaning & Purpose

What does Section 22A of IEA mean?

Plain English Explanation

This section states that oral admissions about the contents of electronic records are not relevant unless the authenticity of the electronic record produced is in question. This means that if someone makes a statement about what's in an email or text message, that statement can't be used as evidence unless the person who produced the email or text message is being questioned about its authenticity.

Practical Interpretation

In real-life court cases, this section means that if someone is trying to use an oral statement about the contents of an electronic record as evidence, the court will only consider it if there's a dispute about the authenticity of the electronic record itself. Otherwise, the oral statement won't be relevant.

Core Legal Purpose

The core purpose of this section is to ensure that electronic records are treated with the same level of scrutiny as other types of evidence, and that oral statements about their contents are only considered relevant when there's a genuine dispute about their authenticity.

Key Legal Elements

•The electronic record must be produced in court.
•The genuineness of the electronic record must be in question.
•The oral admission must be about the contents of the electronic record.
•The oral admission must be relevant to the dispute at hand.

Practical Example

Practical Example of Section 22A IEA

Rajesh and Priya are involved in a dispute over a text message that Rajesh sent to Priya. Priya claims that the text message said something different from what Rajesh is saying it said. In this case, the authenticity of the text message is in question, and Rajesh's oral statement about its contents is relevant. However, if Priya simply wanted to use Rajesh's oral statement as evidence of what the text message said, it wouldn't be relevant unless the authenticity of the text message was also in question.

Common Questions (FAQ)

Frequently Asked Questions about Section 22A IEA

Q: What is the punishment or consequence under Section 22A of IEA?

This section is a procedural provision and does not prescribe a penal punishment.

Q: Does this section apply to private individuals or public entities?

This section applies to all individuals and entities, as it is a general provision of the Indian Evidence Act.

Q: Is an offence under this section bailable or cognizable?

This section is a procedural provision and does not prescribe a penal punishment, so it is neither bailable nor cognizable.

Common Questions about Section 22A IEA

What is Section 22A of IEA?

Section 22A of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 (IEA) defines and regulates "When oral admission as to contents of electronic records are relevant". In plain terms: This section states that oral admissions about the contents of electronic records are not relevant unless the authenticity of the electronic record produced is in question. This means that if someone makes a statement about what's in an email or text message, that statement can't be used as evidence unless the person who produced the email or text message is being questioned about its authenticity.

What are the elements of Section 22A of IEA?

The essential elements of Section 22A of IEA are: The electronic record must be produced in court.; The genuineness of the electronic record must be in question.; The oral admission must be about the contents of the electronic record..

Landmark Case Laws