Skip to main content
Citation Index • Supreme Court

Cases Citing Section 166

Statute: Indian Evidence Act, 1872 (IEA)

Nitish Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 673Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

registered under section 394 of the Indian Penal Code. 3. As per the prosecution case, three unknown accused persons are said to have looted Rs.13,000/ from the petrol pump on the point of firearm. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the F.I.R. was registered agai...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Shahbaj Kuraishi Md. Sharif Quraishi v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 341Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.5311 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-70 Year-2017 Thana- MEHSI District- East Champaran ====================================================== 1.Shahbaj Kuraishi Md. Sharif Quraishi @ Sudhan Quraishi Village – Chaklahi P.S.- Mehs...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Manoj Kumar v. Mr. Amir Subhani, The Chief Secretary, Govt. Of Bihar, Patna

undefined INSC 465Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.125 of 2024 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2484 of 2020 ====================================================== Manoj Kumar, Son of Late Jagdish Rai, Resident of Dharmi Raman Kutir, D.V.C. Road, Yarpur, P.S.- Gardanibagh,...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Archana Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 814Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1412 of 2020 ====================================================== Archana Kumari Wife of Sri Pawan Kumar Singh, Resident of Village- Jagdishpur, P.O. and P.S.- Jagdishpur, District- West Champaran at Bettiah. ... ... Petiti...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →

the Bihar State Tourism Development Corporation (Annexure-5). Thereafter, an agreement was entered into between the parties on 29 th August, 2013. The consideration money was fixed as Rs.17.37 crores, Patna High Court C.R. No.12 of 2021(11) dt.12-01-2024 3/10 as per Clause 5 of the agreement. The ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Niranjan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 267Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

385 , 387/34 of the I.P.C and 27 of the Arms Act. 3. As per allegation in the FIR, two unknown miscreants used to come near his home and after throwing a letter they were fled away from there in which a demand of Rs. 15 lakh was made. It is further alleged that they also used to fire ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Sheikh Zulfakar v. The State Of Bihar Bihar

undefined INSC 344Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

the deceased with various weapons and because of the same the deceased has died. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and he has falsely been implicated in this case. 5. It is also submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Nisha Bharti v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 297Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2438 of 2024 ====================================================== Nisha Bharti Wife of Nagendra Sharma, resident of Village-Naya Tola, Bhalui, P.S.-Chanan, District-Lakhisarai. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1.The State of Bih...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CIVIL REVISION No.12 of 2021 ====================================================== Rang Vikalp registered office at Studio Variation Artists Studio Sardar Patel Colony, Patliputra Colony Telephone Exchange Road behind SIS Security Office, Kurj...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Devendra Ray v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 731Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

for the petitioner submits that petitioner has antecedent of one case. 4. An allegation is of recovery of 46.5 litres of liquor from an Auto. It is next submitted that the petitioner is neither the owner nor the driver of the auto and he came to be implicated based on confes...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
← Previous PagePage 4Next Page →