Cases Citing Section 137
Statute: Indian Evidence Act, 1872 (IEA)
undefined INSC 362 • Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1113 of 2020 ====================================================== Sangita Mandal Wife of Lakshman Mandal Resident of Nirsa Nagar, P.S. and District- Hatiya (Jharkhand) at present residing in the house of Gopal Kumar, 3LF/4/27...
Read Full Judgment Analysis →undefined INSC 188 • Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)
392 of the Indian Penal Code. 3. As per the prosecution, FIR has been lodged against four unknown accused persons against whom there is an allegation of committing robbery in the informant’s bank. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no of...
Read Full Judgment Analysis →undefined INSC 115 • Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)
committing robbery involving snatching / loot of cash, as such, I am not inclined to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the application stands rejected. praful/- (Anil Kumar Sinha, J) U T...
Read Full Judgment Analysis →undefined INSC 643 • Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 217-02-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 342, 323, 379, 504, 506, 34 of the Indian P...
Read Full Judgment Analysis →undefined INSC 532 • Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)
question of fact with regard the date of the marriage of the petitioner, which otherwise also, can not be determined without taking evidences. 9. So far the post of Aganwadi Sevika is concerned, it is a post created under the scheme and not holding any civil post, thus no prot...
Read Full Judgment Analysis →undefined INSC 747 • Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)
marriage of the petitioner was solemnised on 29.11.2017 itself, is the contention of learned Advocate for the petitioner. The order of the Collector, Samastipur is under challenge in the case in hand. 6. Learned Advocate for the petitioner contended that the certificate issued by the prie...
Read Full Judgment Analysis →undefined INSC 771 • Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)
Mr. Ajay Mukherjee, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and Mr. Pramod Kumar Pandey, learned APP appearing on behalf of the State. 2. The petitioners apprehends their arrest in connection with Katoriya P.S. Case No. 257 of 2020 registered under Sections 341, 323, 307, 504, 506, 3...
Read Full Judgment Analysis →undefined INSC 454 • Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)
registered under section 394 of the Indian Penal Code. 3. As per the prosecution case, three unknown accused persons are said to have looted Rs.13,000/ from the petrol pump on the point of firearm. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the F.I.R. was registered agai...
Read Full Judgment Analysis →undefined INSC 433 • Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)
a sand stone statue of Lord Budha having 70 ft height in Bhumi Sparsh posture, on the platform of a height of 30 ft. The learned counsel submitted that as per the Agreement, 30 ft high platform was to be constructed first and thereon the statue of Lord Budha was to be installed. As such, ...
Read Full Judgment Analysis →undefined INSC 381 • Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL REVISION No.148 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.- Year-0 Thana- District- Munger ====================================================== Mukesh Kumar Mandal @ Mukesh Mandal, Son of Raj Kumar Mandal, Resident of Village- Lal Darwaza, P.S.- Kotwali, ...
Read Full Judgment Analysis →