In a prosecution for rape under clause (a), clause (b), clause ( c), clause (d), clause (e), clause (f), clause (g), clause (h), clause (i), clause (j), clause (k), clause (l), clause (m) or clause (n) of sub-section (2) of section 376 of the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860), where sexual intercourse by the accused is proved and the question is whether it was without the consent of the woman alleged to have been raped and such woman states in her evidence before the court that she did not consent, the court shall presume that she did not consent. Explanations In this section, “sexual intercourse” shall mean any of the acts mentioned in clauses (a) to (d) of section 375 of the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860).
Indian Evidence Act, 1872
Section 114A
Presumption as to absence of consent in certain prosecution for rape
⚡ Quick Answer Reference: Section 114A IEA
- Provision: Section 114A of IEA
- Act: Indian Evidence Act, 1872
- Classification: evidence
- Jurisdiction: India
- Summary: This section presumes a woman did not consent to sexual intercourse in certain rape prosecutions if she states so in court.
What does Section 114A of IEA say?
Embed this Section Card
Want to display this Section explanation card on your website? Copy and paste the HTML code below:
What does Section 114A of IEA mean?
Plain English Explanation
This section presumes a woman did not consent to sexual intercourse in certain rape prosecutions if she states so in court.
Practical Interpretation
In practice, this means the court will assume the woman did not consent if she testifies to that effect, shifting the burden to the accused.
Core Legal Purpose
The purpose is to protect victims of rape by creating a presumption of non-consent when they testify to it, aiding in the prosecution of such crimes.
- •The prosecution must be under specific clauses of section 376 of the Indian Penal Code.
- •The woman must state in her evidence before the court that she did not consent to the sexual intercourse.
- •The key legal test is whether the woman's statement of non-consent is credible and supported by the circumstances.
- •A key exception could be if the accused can provide evidence that contradicts the woman's statement of non-consent.
Practical Example of Section 114A IEA
For example, if Rajesh is prosecuted for rape under section 376 and the woman, Priya, testifies that she did not consent to the sexual intercourse, the court will presume she did not consent, unless Rajesh can provide evidence to the contrary.
Frequently Asked Questions about Section 114A IEA
Q: What is the punishment or consequence under Section 114A of IEA?
This section is a procedural provision and does not prescribe a penal punishment.
Q: Does this section apply to private individuals or public entities?
This section applies in the context of criminal prosecutions under the Indian Penal Code, which can involve both private individuals and public entities.
Q: Is an offence under this section bailable or cognizable?
This section itself does not classify an offence as bailable or cognizable; those classifications are determined by other provisions of law.
Common Questions about Section 114A IEA
What is Section 114A of IEA?
Section 114A of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 (IEA) defines and regulates "Presumption as to absence of consent in certain prosecution for rape". In plain terms: This section presumes a woman did not consent to sexual intercourse in certain rape prosecutions if she states so in court.
What are the elements of Section 114A of IEA?
The essential elements of Section 114A of IEA are: The prosecution must be under specific clauses of section 376 of the Indian Penal Code.; The woman must state in her evidence before the court that she did not consent to the sexual intercourse.; The key legal test is whether the woman's statement of non-consent is credible and supported by the circumstances..
What replaced Section 114A of IPC in BNS?
Section 114A of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) was replaced by Section 119 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) 2023. Rape — lack of consent presumed: BSA retains.
⚠️ Material Change: Rape — lack of consent presumed: BSA retains.
View New Law Equivalent →Compare Side-by-Side →Landmark Judgments under Section 114A IEA
Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)
Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)
Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)
Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)
Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)
Sections commonly cited alongside Section 114A
Ask Nyaya AI About Section 114A
Select a pre-configured prompt to run this section through the grounded research engine.