Skip to main content
⚠️ Material Changes Identified

Law Transition Comparison: Section 106 IEA vs Section 106 BSA

Side-by-side analysis of statutory changes, penal differences, bailable classification, trial courts, and precedents following India's July 2024 criminal law transition.

⚠️ Material Difference Highlights

Special knowledge: Identical.

AI Legal Analysis & Key Differences

Statutory Analysis: The transition from BSA to IEA for this provision introduces material changes to the legal framework.

Specific Modifications:

Special knowledge: Identical.

Penal & Procedural Impact:

The statutory maximum penalties and offenses classification remain consistent, but procedural execution under the new Sanhitas is subject to revised guidelines.

Transition Checklist for Legal Practitioners

Verify Date of Offense (Crucial for Application)

If the alleged offense occurred before July 1, 2024, substantive charges must be filed under the old act (BSA). For offenses on or after July 1, 2024, use the new Sanhita (IEA).

Nomenclature Audit in Pleadings

Ensure all draft petitions, FIRs, charge sheets, and bail applications refer to Section 106 of the IEA instead of the old Section 106 of the BSA.

Confirm Savings Clause Compliance

Apply the savings clause (Section 531 BNSS or Section 358 BNS) to confirm that any trials, appeals, or investigations pending as of July 1, 2024 continue under the old code (BSA) as if the new Sanhitas had not been enacted.

Review Updated Bail and Trial Jurisdiction

Double-check the schedule in BNSS or CrPC to verify if the trial court jurisdiction (e.g. Session Court vs Magistrate) or the bailable status has been altered for Section 106.

Act Source (Active Site)

Section 106

Indian Evidence Act, 1872

Official Statutory Text

When any fact is especially within the knowledge of any person, the burden of proving that fact is upon him.

Procedural Profile

Offence CategoryN/A / Procedural
Bail EligibilityProcedural
Arrest ClassificationProcedural
Trial CourtProcedural
Max PunishmentProcedural
Act Source (Compared)

Section 106

Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam

Official Statutory Text

The burden of proof as to any particular fact lies on that person who wishes the Court to believe in its existence, unless it is provided by any law that the proof of that fact shall lie on any particular person. Illustration. A prosecutes B for theft, and wishes the Court to believe that B admitted the theft to C. A must prove the admission. B wishes the Court to believe that, at the time in question, he was elsewhere. He must prove it.

Procedural Profile

Offence CategoryN/A / Procedural
Bail EligibilityProcedural
Arrest ClassificationProcedural
Trial CourtProcedural
Max PunishmentProcedural
Explore Section 106 DetailsExplore Section 106 Details