Cases Citing Section 103
Statute: Indian Evidence Act, 1872 (IEA)
undefined INSC 120 • Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)
No. 163 of 2023 registered for the offence under Sections 394/395/412 of the Indian Penal Code and under Section 25 (1-b)A, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act. 3. As per the prosecution case, the allegation against four unknown miscreants is that they assaulted the informant and looted a cas...
Read Full Judgment Analysis →undefined INSC 187 • Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)
506, 379, 365, 364(A) of the Indian Penal Code read with section 141 of the Railways Act. 3. As per the prosecution case, the FIR has been lodged against the petitioner and other 10-11 unknown accused persons against whom there is an allegation that they have kidnapped the passenger from the runnin...
Read Full Judgment Analysis →undefined INSC 399 • Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)
Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has antecedent of one case and allegation is of recovery of 277 liter of liquor from a Truck. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was not arrested from t...
Read Full Judgment Analysis →undefined INSC 161 • Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4079 of 2021 ====================================================== Parixhan Rai Son of Kanshi Rai Resident of Village-Ufarpura, Post office- Sahay Nagar Dhanaut, Police Station-Phulwari Sharif, District-Patna. ... .....
Read Full Judgment Analysis →undefined INSC 545 • Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)
that in the present case, prima facie, petitioner as well as 1 st auction purchaser have made out a case that they are tentatively entitled to a sum of Rs.14 lakhs plus interest on behalf of the petitioner and first auction purchaser @ Rs. 7,89,700/-. If these amounts are required to be determined ...
Read Full Judgment Analysis →undefined INSC 371 • Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)
come under the purview of superstructure, as mentioned in Section 2(k) of the Act, 2008. 12. The Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of M/s Brahmaputra Infrastructure Ltd. (supra), after referring Sections 8, 9 and 22 of the Act 2008 has held in paragraph-5 of the said...
Read Full Judgment Analysis →undefined INSC 615 • Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1026 of 2023 ====================================================== 1.Ram Janam Rai S/o Ramvriksh Rai Resident of Village- BhauPrasad, P.S.- Dumara, Post- Parmanandpur, District- Sitamarhi. 2.Prem Lal Yadav S/o Late Janaki Rai,...
Read Full Judgment Analysis →undefined INSC 671 • Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Letters Patent Appeal No.3 of 2022 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10685 of 2019 ====================================================== Vinni Kumari presently residing at Bhawar Pokhar, Behind Khetan Market, P.S. - Pirbahore, district- Patna, Posted as Dre...
Read Full Judgment Analysis →undefined INSC 782 • Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)
Biharsharif, Nalanda, where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Excise P.S. Case No. 766 of 2023, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. aditi/- (Satyavrat Verma, J) U T...
Read Full Judgment Analysis →undefined INSC 216 • Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)
the prosecution case, the petitioner is said to have stolen a Tractor. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and he has falsely been implicated in this case. 5. It is also submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has clean ...
Read Full Judgment Analysis →