Cases Citing Section 41
Statute: Indian Divorce Act, 1869 (indian-divorce-act-1869)
undefined INSC 662 • Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)
P.N. Shahi, Sr. Advocate Mr.Avinash Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s: Mr. Abbas Haider, SC-6 Mr. Wasi Mohammad, AC to SC-6 For the Corporation : Mr. Rabindra Kumar Priyadarshi, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY...
Read Full Judgment Analysis →undefined INSC 310 • Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)
registered for the offence/s punishable u/s 376 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code. 4. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner is alleged to have established physical relationship with the Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.3771 of 2024(2) dt.24-01-2024 2/3 victim on the pretext of the marriage....
Read Full Judgment Analysis →undefined INSC 806 • Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)
Resident of Mohalla Dalmia House Dhami Tola, K P Road, P.S. Kotwali, Gaya District Gaya that Petitioner no. 1is Presently residing at-402, Smundra Gaurav, Worli Sea Face, Worli Colony, P.S.-Worli, Mumbai, Maharashtra 4.Sheo Arun Dalmia Son of Late Vishwanath Dalmia @ Bishwanath Laxm...
Read Full Judgment Analysis →undefined INSC 525 • Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)
and the injuries are lacerated wounds of size 5” X 0.25” and 3” X 0.25” over vertix of head length and frontal part of head length respectively, apart from chest pain and pain and tenderness over left leg. Learned counsel further submits that petitioner no. 1 & 2 are ladies and against petitioner ...
Read Full Judgment Analysis →undefined INSC 479 • Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.249 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-380 Year-2018 Thana- GHORASAHAN District- East Champaran ====================================================== 1.Ramji Mahto Son Of Jai Mangal Mahto Resident Of Village - Mahdeva, P.S. - Ghorasa...
Read Full Judgment Analysis →undefined INSC 131 • Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)
of fact with regard the date of the marriage, the same ought not to be considered while exercising the writ jurisdiction. The petitioner has always been at liberty to approach before the Civil Court of competent jurisdiction to settle the disputed question of fact. 8. This Court has heard the lea...
Read Full Judgment Analysis →undefined INSC 274 • Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.4141 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-765 Year-2023 Thana- PATRAKARNAGAR District- Patna ====================================================== Kumar Pushpak S/O Late Parmeshwer Prasad R/O Villag- Ruidhasa, Kali Mandir, P.S And Di...
Read Full Judgment Analysis →undefined INSC 142 • Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)
506, 379, 365, 364(A) of the Indian Penal Code read with section 141 of the Railways Act. 3. As per the prosecution case, the FIR has been lodged against the petitioner and other 10-11 unknown accused persons against whom there is an allegation that they have kidnapped the passenger from the runnin...
Read Full Judgment Analysis →undefined INSC 217 • Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)
: (In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 4141 of 2024) For the Petitioner/s: Mr. Nishant Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s: Mr. Harendra Prasad, APP (In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 7123 of 2024) For the Petitioner/s: Mr. Prince Kumar Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s: Mr. Abhay Kumar, A...
Read Full Judgment Analysis →undefined INSC 355 • Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)
ORDER 612-08-2024Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. Despite valid service of notice, nobody appears on behalf of the Opposite Party No. 2. 3. The petitioner apprehends arrest in a complaint case registered for the offences punishable und...
Read Full Judgment Analysis →