Skip to main content
Citation Index • Supreme Court

Cases Citing Section 41

Statute: Indian Divorce Act, 1869 (indian-divorce-act-1869)

Gajendra Thakur v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 260Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 404-07-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. 2. Petitioners apprehend arrest in a case registered for Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.5021 of 2024(4) dt.04-07-2024 2/3 the offence punishable under sections 323 , 4...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Archana Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 797Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1412 of 2020 ====================================================== Archana Kumari Wife of Sri Pawan Kumar Singh, Resident of Village- Jagdishpur, P.O. and P.S.- Jagdishpur, District- West Champaran at Bettiah. ... ... Petiti...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Kumar Pushpak v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 661Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioners are in custody in a case registered under Sections 419, 420, 467, 478, 471 and 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4141 of 2024(5) dt.08-10-2024 2/3 3. As per allegation in the FIR, pet...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Sita Ram Singh v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 837Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

Sita Ram Yadav ( GP-16 ) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIBEK CHAUDHURI ORAL ORDER 410-09-2024The petitioners was a daily wage employee in Minor Irrigation Department in the District of Katihar. His service was terminated by an order dated 09.03...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Shila Devi v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 245Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.10910 of 2024 In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.45166 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-308 Year-2021 Thana- PIRPAINTI District- Bhagalpur ====================================================== 1.Shila Devi W/O Arvind Yadav R/O Village-...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Dipak Kumar Jha v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 179Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1507 of 2017 ====================================================== Dipak Kumar Jha Son of Late Shyam Charan Jha, Grand Son of Late Tara Charan Jha @ Lalan Babu Resident of Village - Mahisi, P.O. and P.S. - Mahisi, ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Upendra Kumar v. Ashok Rai

undefined INSC 398Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

construction over the suit property and parties were directed to maintain status quo without hearing the defendant/petitioner. No notice was issued as is reflected from the copy of the order sheet Patna High Court C.Misc. No.57 of 2024 dt.02-02-2024 2/4 attached with the present petition. ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Sheo Charan Dalmia v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 725Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

(ii) further for direction to the respondents particularly respondent no. 3, 4 & 7 to abstain from creating unnecessary and unreasonable restrictions upon the petitioners in exercising their right to Patna High Court CWJC No.729 of 2024(2) dt.25-04-2024 3/5 property including right to alie...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Upendra Kumar v. Ashok Rai

undefined INSC 667Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION No.57 of 2024 ====================================================== Upendra Kumar @ Upendra Roy Son of Ashok Rai, Resident of Mauza, Mirpur, Bhuwal, P.O.- Dighwara, Police Station- Dighwara, District- Sar...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →

a sand stone statue of Lord Budha having 70 ft height in Bhumi Sparsh posture, on the platform of a height of 30 ft. The learned counsel submitted that as per the Agreement, 30 ft high platform was to be constructed first and thereon the statue of Lord Budha was to be installed. As such, ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
← Previous PagePage 3Next Page →