Skip to main content
Citation Index • Supreme Court

Cases Citing Section 59

Statute: Consumer Protection Act, 2019 (consumer-protection-act-2019)

Archana Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 350Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1412 of 2020 ====================================================== Archana Kumari Wife of Sri Pawan Kumar Singh, Resident of Village- Jagdishpur, P.O. and P.S.- Jagdishpur, District- West Champaran at Bettiah. ... ... Petiti...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Archana Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 737Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

authorities shall take action against the petitioner in accordance with law. 6.A counter affidavit is filed on behalf of the State in which he has stated that any degree of Tribhuwan University, Nepal has been declared ‘not valid’ for appointment of regular/Niyojit teachers. All niyojan units were ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Fakir Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 263Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

to necessarily set aside. 9. Having regard to the above facts and circumstances and the law laid down by this Hon’ble Court, the present CWJC is allowed. The impugned order passed by the Revisional Authority dated 13.04.2018 as well as the order passed by the Sub-Divisional Officer, Jhanjharpur dat...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Mukesh Kumar Mandal v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 518Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

the petitioner to pay Rs. 3,000/- per month to the opposite party and Rs. 1,000/- each per month for their three children, total being Rs. 6,000/-. 8. This Court is of the considered view that if, the petitioner is directed to pay Rs. 6,000/- he is required to pay towards maintenance allowance ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Mukesh Kumar Mandal v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 634Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

some extent so that the petitioner can make payment of the maintenance allowance. 5. I have perused the materials on record. The opposite party in her evidence admitted in cross-examination that the Patna High Court CR. REV. No.148 of 2019 dt.24-04-2024 3/4 petitioner is a day labourer. There is o...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Dhurendra Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 394Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

the prosecution case, the petitioner is said to have stolen a Tractor. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and he has falsely been implicated in this case. 5. It is also submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has clean ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Mukesh Kumar Mandal v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 376Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

the final order of maintenance under Section 125 of the Cr.P.C., passed in Maintenance Case No. 46 of 2016 by the learned Principal Judge, Family Court at Munger on 19 th November, 2018, whereby and Patna High Court CR. REV. No.148 of 2019 dt.24-04-2024 2/4 whereunder the learned Principal ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →

Pramod Sah presently residing at C/o Bachchu Rajak, Mohalla- Mahendru, Near Malariya Office, P.S.- Sultanganj, District- Patna, presently posted as Dresser in the Department of Surgical I.C.U. Patna Medical College and Hospital, Patna. 12.Pushpa Rani W/o Purushottam Das presently residing at - C/o ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
The Union Of India v. Lalan Kumar

undefined INSC 708Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

68% Match

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI and HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. G. ANUPAMA CHAKRAVARTHY ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI) 512-07-2024 Heard MJC No. 789 of 2018 for restoration of CWJC No. 22349 of 2012. On 18.09.2017, CWJC No 22349 of 2012 was dismissed for non-pr...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Quamuddin Chisty v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 250Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

68% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.562 of 2024 ====================================================== Quamuddin Chisty S/o Late Suleman Miyan, resident of Village-Ward No. 13, Mathurapur Math Gopal, P.s.-Pipra Kothi, District-East Champaran. ... ... Petitioner...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
← Previous PagePage 4Next Page →