Skip to main content
Citation Index • Supreme Court

Cases Citing Section 57

Statute: Consumer Protection Act, 2019 (consumer-protection-act-2019)

Virendra Mukhiya v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 593Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

17.520 liters of Nepali Saufi wine has been recovered from the house of petitioner. 4. It is submitted on behalf of petitioner that alleged recovery has been effected from the house, which is in joint possession of the family members. Petitioner lives out of Bihar for his livelihood and he has got ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Dhurendra Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 867Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

the prosecution case, the petitioner is said to have stolen a Tractor. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and he has falsely been implicated in this case. 5. It is also submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has clean ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Krishnadeo Poddar v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 123Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.10 of 2020 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12370 of 2015 ====================================================== Krishnadeo Poddar Son of Late Sitabi Poddar, Retired Head Electrician, Muzaffapur Electric Supply Circle, res...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Mukesh Kumar Mandal v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 257Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL REVISION No.148 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.- Year-0 Thana- District- Munger ====================================================== Mukesh Kumar Mandal @ Mukesh Mandal, Son of Raj Kumar Mandal, Resident of Village- Lal Darwaza, P.S.- Kotwali, ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Mukesh Kumar Mandal v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 217Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

some extent so that the petitioner can make payment of the maintenance allowance. 5. I have perused the materials on record. The opposite party in her evidence admitted in cross-examination that the Patna High Court CR. REV. No.148 of 2019 dt.24-04-2024 3/4 petitioner is a day labourer. There is o...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar (2014) 8 SCC 273

2014 8 SCC 273Supreme Court of India

69% Match

FACTS: Anticipatory bail application in a Section 498A IPC cruelty case. Held: Arrest should not be the default action in offences carrying punishment of less than 7 years. Ratio: Police must comply with Section 41A CrPC (now Section 35 BNSS) notice guidelines before executing arrest....

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Mukesh Kumar Mandal v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 568Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

the final order of maintenance under Section 125 of the Cr.P.C., passed in Maintenance Case No. 46 of 2016 by the learned Principal Judge, Family Court at Munger on 19 th November, 2018, whereby and Patna High Court CR. REV. No.148 of 2019 dt.24-04-2024 2/4 whereunder the learned Principal ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Fakir Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 451Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

the very maintainability of the writ petition and stated that the present writ petition is not maintainable as the petitioner has exhausted all the remedies and all the authorities have found that the Patna High Court CWJC No.1117 of 2019(3) dt.23-01-2024 3/4 petitioner has violated the provisions...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Mukesh Kumar Mandal v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 115Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

the petitioner to pay Rs. 3,000/- per month to the opposite party and Rs. 1,000/- each per month for their three children, total being Rs. 6,000/-. 8. This Court is of the considered view that if, the petitioner is directed to pay Rs. 6,000/- he is required to pay towards maintenance allowance ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Fakir Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 306Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

ground of irregularity.” 3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has stated that in the Show Cause Notice issued by the Sub-Divisional Officer there is no proposal for cancellation of Patna High Court CWJC No.1117 of 2019(3) dt.23-01-2024 2/4 the license. Learned counsel has state...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
← Previous PagePage 2Next Page →