Skip to main content
Citation Index • Supreme Court

Cases Citing Section 53

Statute: Consumer Protection Act, 2019 (consumer-protection-act-2019)

KS Puttaswamy v. Union of India (2017) 10 SCC 1

2017 10 SCC 1Supreme Court of India

69% Match

FACTS: Challenged Aadhaar biometrics scheme as violating privacy. Held: Right to Privacy is a fundamental right guaranteed under Articles 14, 19, and 21 of the Constitution of India. Ratio: Privacy is intrinsic to life and personal liberty, subject to proportionality tests for state restrictions....

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Manjit Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 709Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner has been made accused Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.3761 of 2024(2) dt.12-02-2024 2/3 in this case only because of the co...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Kaushal Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 250Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2681 of 2019 ====================================================== Kaushal Kumar S/o Late Jagdish Kumar Vidyarthi R/o Village- Muhabbatpur, PO- Muhabbatpurvia Dewaiya Kothi, District- Muzaffarpur ... ... Petitioner/s Versus ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →

Mufasil, District- Begusarai, Presently residing at C/O Bhushan Jee, Sakuntala Kunj, Subhakarmana Colony, East Laxminagar, P.S. - Ramkrishna Nagar, Patna presently posted as Dresser in O.T. - 4, Patna Medical College Hospital, Patna. 7.Ajay Kumar Son of Suryabansh Singh presently residing at C/o, M...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Krishnadeo Poddar v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 783Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.10 of 2020 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12370 of 2015 ====================================================== Krishnadeo Poddar Son of Late Sitabi Poddar, Retired Head Electrician, Muzaffapur Electric Supply Circle, res...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India (1978) 1 SCC 248

1978 1 SCC 248Supreme Court of India

69% Match

FACTS: Petitioner's passport was impounded without giving reasons. Held: Article 21 procedure must be 'just, fair, and reasonable', not arbitrary or oppressive. Ratio: Expanded Article 21 scope, introducing substantive due process principles into Indian jurisprudence....

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
The Union Of India v. Lalan Kumar

undefined INSC 851Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI and HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. G. ANUPAMA CHAKRAVARTHY ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI) 512-07-2024 Heard MJC No. 789 of 2018 for restoration of CWJC No. 22349 of 2012. On 18.09.2017, CWJC No 22349 of 2012 was dismissed for non-pr...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Quamuddin Chisty v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 858Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

of the petitioner.” 3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has stated that in the Show Cause Notice issued by the Sub-Divisional Officer there is no proposal for cancellation of Patna High Court CWJC No.562 of 2024(4) dt.10-05-2024 2/4 the license. Learned counsel has stated that...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Panchu Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 761Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1113 of 2019 ====================================================== Panchu Paswan S/o Late Kailu Paswan Resident of Village Bhagatpur PS Balliya,Dist.-Begusarai ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1.The State Of Bihar through the...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Archana Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 531Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

authorities shall take action against the petitioner in accordance with law. 6.A counter affidavit is filed on behalf of the State in which he has stated that any degree of Tribhuwan University, Nepal has been declared ‘not valid’ for appointment of regular/Niyojit teachers. All niyojan units were ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
← Previous PagePage 3Next Page →