Skip to main content
Citation Index • Supreme Court

Cases Citing Section 52

Statute: Consumer Protection Act, 2019 (consumer-protection-act-2019)

Rajesh Tewari v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 339Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

68% Match

its auction, certain procedure were required to be drawn by the competent authority like Mechanical Engineer or Automobile Engineer. Such person has to access the vehicle in the manner known to the Patna High Court CWJC No.1022 of 2021 dt.09-12-2024 5/12 law under the Motor Vehicles Act read with ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Archana Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 582Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

68% Match

authorities shall take action against the petitioner in accordance with law. 6.A counter affidavit is filed on behalf of the State in which he has stated that any degree of Tribhuwan University, Nepal has been declared ‘not valid’ for appointment of regular/Niyojit teachers. All niyojan units were ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Upendra Kumar v. Ashok Rai

undefined INSC 609Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

68% Match

दी द एव फ दी स वा बितू त क क स वा स्थि ब वववा ब दत जमदी न पर हलो रह क ब नमर्मा ण कवा यर्य कवा फ लोटलो ग्रवा फ दवा ब खिल ब कयवा गयवा और ब नव क दन ब कयवा गयवा ब क मददवा लहन मदकदमवा कदी जवा नकवा रदी क क Patna High Court C.Misc. No.57 of 2024 dt.02-02-2024 3/4 बिवावजतू न्यवा यवा लय नहदी आकर ब वववा ब...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Lalita Kumari v. Government of UP (2013) 2 SCC 1

2013 2 SCC 1Supreme Court of India

68% Match

FACTS: Petition seeking action for police failure to register an FIR for kidnapping. Held: Registration of FIR is mandatory under Section 154 CrPC (now Section 173 BNSS) if the information discloses a cognizable offence. Ratio: No preliminary inquiry is permitted if cognizable offence is disclosed; ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Rajesh Tewari v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 672Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

68% Match

at a particular figure in respect of petitioner and first auction purchaser. Petitioner is concerned with the Insurance Policy dated 05.02.2020 that was in vogue till 04.02.2021 and it was insured Patna High Court CWJC No.1022 of 2021 dt.09-12-2024 8/12 for Rs.14 lacs read with the date of seizure...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →

in holding that it has no jurisdiction to decide the matter. Undisputedly, the authority mentioned in paragraph-22 of the Agreement has only jurisdiction over the subject matter of the contract. 14. The revision application is accordingly dismissed. 15. As it has already been submitted that the ma...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Rajesh Tewari v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 472Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

68% Match

as scrap. 6. The aforementioned decision has been taken by us in order to give quietus to the litigation, otherwise certain disputed facts are involved in order to investigate as to why petitioner got his vehicle insured on 05.02.2020 for about Rs.14 lacs with reference to the vehicle was 7 years o...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Panchu Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 352Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

68% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1113 of 2019 ====================================================== Panchu Paswan S/o Late Kailu Paswan Resident of Village Bhagatpur PS Balliya,Dist.-Begusarai ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1.The State Of Bihar through the...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Ramji Mahto v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 890Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

68% Match

counsel appearing on behalf of appellants and learned Spl. Public Prosecutor for the State. 2. This appeal has been filed against the order dated 19.10.2023 passed by learned Special Judge, SC/ST Act, Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.249 of 2024(3) dt.12-09-2024 2/2 Motihari, East Champaran in con...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Virendra Mukhiya v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 517Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

68% Match

17.520 liters of Nepali Saufi wine has been recovered from the house of petitioner. 4. It is submitted on behalf of petitioner that alleged recovery has been effected from the house, which is in joint possession of the family members. Petitioner lives out of Bihar for his livelihood and he has got ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
← Previous PagePage 3Next Page →