Skip to main content
Citation Index • Supreme Court

Cases Citing Section 41

Statute: Constitution of India (Constitution)

come under the purview of superstructure, as mentioned in Section 2(k) of the Act, 2008. 12. The Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of M/s Brahmaputra Infrastructure Ltd. (supra), after referring Sections 8, 9 and 22 of the Act 2008 has held in paragraph-5 of the said...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Jyoti Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 671Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

71% Match

available. It is apt and proper to refer the judgment rendered by this Court in the case of Parvati Devi @ Parvati Singh Vs. The State of Bihar and Ors., reported in 2024 (1) BLJ 178 held as follows: Patna High Court CWJC No.426 of 2022 dt.26-11-2024 6/8 “5. This Court would also refer ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →

a sand stone statue of Lord Budha having 70 ft height in Bhumi Sparsh posture, on the platform of a height of 30 ft. The learned counsel submitted that as per the Agreement, 30 ft high platform was to be constructed first and thereon the statue of Lord Budha was to be installed. As such, ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Sanjay Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 571Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

70% Match

the offences under Sections 414 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 8/20 (b) (ii) (B) of the Narcotic Drug & Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985. 3. As per prosecution case, total 6 Kgs. Ganja wrapped in a polythene bag along with a theft motorcycle were recovered from the possession of the petition...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Kumar Pushpak v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 250Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

70% Match

learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioners are in custody in a case registered under Sections 419, 420, 467, 478, 471 and 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4141 of 2024(5) dt.08-10-2024 2/3 3. As per allegation in the FIR, pet...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Kumar Pushpak v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 258Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

70% Match

: (In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 4141 of 2024) For the Petitioner/s: Mr. Nishant Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s: Mr. Harendra Prasad, APP (In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 7123 of 2024) For the Petitioner/s: Mr. Prince Kumar Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s: Mr. Abhay Kumar, A...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Upendra Kumar v. Ashok Rai

undefined INSC 453Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

दी द एव फ दी स वा बितू त क क स वा स्थि ब वववा ब दत जमदी न पर हलो रह क ब नमर्मा ण कवा यर्य कवा फ लोटलो ग्रवा फ दवा ब खिल ब कयवा गयवा और ब नव क दन ब कयवा गयवा ब क मददवा लहन मदकदमवा कदी जवा नकवा रदी क क Patna High Court C.Misc. No.57 of 2024 dt.02-02-2024 3/4 बिवावजतू न्यवा यवा लय नहदी आकर ब वववा ब...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Jyoti Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 557Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

deems it fit and proper to refer to a judgment rendered by the learned Division Bench of this Court in the case of Babita Kumari v. The State of Bihar and others, reported in 2016 SCC Online Pat 9434, paragraphs no. 7 and 8 whereof are reproduced herein below:- “7. Having considered t...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →

parties ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s: Mr. S.D.Sanjay,Sr. Advodate Mr. Mohit Agarwal Mr. Rahul Kumar Mr.Vishal Kumar Ms. Priya Gupta For the State Mr. Nalin Vilochan Tiwary, AC to GA 9 For BSTDCL Mr. Kumar A...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →

which was to be based on a platform of 30 ft height. As such, the work performed by the petitioner in pursuance of the contract comes under the definition of ‘work contract’ defined in Section 2(k) of the Act 2008. Therefore, the Arbitration Tribunal has jurisdiction over the disput...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
← Previous PagePage 1Next Page →