Skip to main content
Citation Index • Supreme Court

Cases Citing Section 9

Statute: Companies Act, 2013 (companies-act-2013)

Jyoti Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 685Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

deems it fit and proper to refer to a judgment rendered by the learned Division Bench of this Court in the case of Babita Kumari v. The State of Bihar and others, reported in 2016 SCC Online Pat 9434, paragraphs no. 7 and 8 whereof are reproduced herein below:- “7. Having considered t...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Harendra Prasad Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 803Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

petitioner. Therefore, the same has to held as bad, illegal, contrary to the provisions of Rule 27(ii) of the Control Order and has to necessarily set aside. 9. Having regard to the above facts and circumstances and the law laid down by this Hon’ble...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India (1978) 1 SCC 248

1978 1 SCC 248Supreme Court of India

69% Match

FACTS: Petitioner's passport was impounded without giving reasons. Held: Article 21 procedure must be 'just, fair, and reasonable', not arbitrary or oppressive. Ratio: Expanded Article 21 scope, introducing substantive due process principles into Indian jurisprudence....

Read Full Judgment Analysis →

P.S.- Alamganj, District- Patna, presently posted as Dresser in R.S.B. O.T. No. 5, Patna Medical College and Hospital, Patna. 23.Chandan Kumar S/o Sudama Singh resident of Village- Karma, Post- Karma, Via- Nasriganj, P.S.- Karakat (Gorari), District- Rohtas, presently posted as Dresser in R.S.B. O....

Read Full Judgment Analysis →

of the Act 2008. Therefore, the Arbitration Tribunal has jurisdiction over the dispute. 9. So far as the submission of the learned Senior Counsel is concerned, the word ‘superstructure’ has no where Patna High Court C.R. No.12 of 2021(11) dt.12-01-2024 8/10 been defined in the Act 2008. ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Rajesh Tewari v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 727Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

at a particular figure in respect of petitioner and first auction purchaser. Petitioner is concerned with the Insurance Policy dated 05.02.2020 that was in vogue till 04.02.2021 and it was insured Patna High Court CWJC No.1022 of 2021 dt.09-12-2024 8/12 for Rs.14 lacs read with the date of seizure...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Jyoti Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 232Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

appointment letter and in his place, the respondent no. 8 was selected as Aganwadi Sevika. 4. On the other hand, the respondent no. 8 obtained only 58.60 % marks, much less than the petitioner, who obtained 76% marks, nonetheless her case was placed for consideration and, as such,...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →

in holding that it has no jurisdiction to decide the matter. Undisputedly, the authority mentioned in paragraph-22 of the Agreement has only jurisdiction over the subject matter of the contract. 14. The revision application is accordingly dismissed. 15. As it has already been submitted that the ma...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Rajesh Tewari v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 708Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

that in the present case, prima facie, petitioner as well as 1 st auction purchaser have made out a case that they are tentatively entitled to a sum of Rs.14 lakhs plus interest on behalf of the petitioner and first auction purchaser @ Rs. 7,89,700/-. If these amounts are required to be determined ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →

the issue will be resolved by the Managing Director, Bihar State Tourism Development Corporation, Ltd. amicably. However, in case of any deadlock, Secretary Tourism Govt. of Bihar will be the sole Patna High Court C.R. No.12 of 2021(11) dt.12-01-2024 6/10 arbitrator.” 6. The learned counsel ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
← Previous PagePage 4Next Page →