Skip to main content
Citation Index • Supreme Court

Cases Citing Section 445

Statute: Companies Act, 2013 (companies-act-2013)

Ramji Mahto v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 746Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

68% Match

counsel appearing on behalf of appellants and learned Spl. Public Prosecutor for the State. 2. This appeal has been filed against the order dated 19.10.2023 passed by learned Special Judge, SC/ST Act, Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.249 of 2024(3) dt.12-09-2024 2/2 Motihari, East Champaran in con...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →

with a liberty to the appellant to approach the High Court with appropriate application. The petitioner again filed CWJC No. 10874 of 2014, which was withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to Patna High Court C.R. No.12 of 2021(11) dt.12-01-2024 4/10 approach the forum of arbitration for settlem...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →

the letter sent by him is still with the Managing Director, Bihar State Tourism Development Corporation, who is Arbitrator, as per paragraph- 22 of the Agreement, which is extracted hereinbelow:- “22. In case of any difference of opinion in any item of work the issue will be resolved by the Man...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Upendra Kumar v. Ashok Rai

undefined INSC 323Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

68% Match

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 02-02-2024 The matter has been taken up on mentioning being made on behalf of the petitioner. 2. The petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 23.11.2023 passed by learned Subordinate Judge-I, ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Upendra Kumar v. Ashok Rai

undefined INSC 465Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

68% Match

construction over the suit property and parties were directed to maintain status quo without hearing the defendant/petitioner. No notice was issued as is reflected from the copy of the order sheet Patna High Court C.Misc. No.57 of 2024 dt.02-02-2024 2/4 attached with the present petition. ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Harendra Prasad Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 801Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

68% Match

petitioner. Therefore, the same has to held as bad, illegal, contrary to the provisions of Rule 27(ii) of the Control Order and has to necessarily set aside. 9. Having regard to the above facts and circumstances and the law laid down by this Hon’ble...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India (1978) 1 SCC 248

1978 1 SCC 248Supreme Court of India

68% Match

FACTS: Petitioner's passport was impounded without giving reasons. Held: Article 21 procedure must be 'just, fair, and reasonable', not arbitrary or oppressive. Ratio: Expanded Article 21 scope, introducing substantive due process principles into Indian jurisprudence....

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Ritu Priya v. Abhishek Kumar Singh

undefined INSC 289Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

68% Match

(Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI) 418-12-2024In terms of the previous order dated 20.11.2024, the present Miscellaneous Appeal No. 2 of 2023 stands dismissed for non-compliance. manish/- (P. B. Bajanthri, J) ( Ramesh Chand Malviya, J) U...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Sita Ram Singh v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 740Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

68% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.414 of 2022 ====================================================== 1.Sita Ram Singh, son of Late Mathura Singh, Resident of Village-Tarhari, Police Station-Halsi, District-Lakhisarai. 2.Priya Shankar Sah, son of Late Shree Kant...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Devendra Ray v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 818Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

68% Match

for the petitioner submits that petitioner has antecedent of one case. 4. An allegation is of recovery of 46.5 litres of liquor from an Auto. It is next submitted that the petitioner is neither the owner nor the driver of the auto and he came to be implicated based on confes...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
← Previous PagePage 4Next Page →