Cases Citing Section 64
Statute: Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS)
undefined INSC 380 • Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)
the Bidhyapati Mandir, Samastipur, where the marriage was solemnised categorically demonstrates that the marriage of the petitioner with Ajeet Kumar Aryan was solemnised before the cut off date and as Patna High Court CWJC No.426 of 2022 dt.26-11-2024 4/8 such non-selection of the petitioner by tr...
Read Full Judgment Analysis →undefined INSC 315 • Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)
the petitioner to pay Rs. 3,000/- per month to the opposite party and Rs. 1,000/- each per month for their three children, total being Rs. 6,000/-. 8. This Court is of the considered view that if, the petitioner is directed to pay Rs. 6,000/- he is required to pay towards maintenance allowance ...
Read Full Judgment Analysis →undefined INSC 304 • Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)
on anticipatory bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned Chief J...
Read Full Judgment Analysis →undefined INSC 186 • Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)
128 of 2019 by the Collector, Samstipur whereby he allowed the appeal preferred by the respondent no. 8 and set aside the order dated 19.01.2019 passed by the District Programme Officer, Samastipur in Patna High Court CWJC No.426 of 2022 dt.26-11-2024 2/8 Aganwadi Case No. 178 of 2018 and upheld t...
Read Full Judgment Analysis →undefined INSC 468 • Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1412 of 2020 ====================================================== Archana Kumari Wife of Sri Pawan Kumar Singh, Resident of Village- Jagdishpur, P.O. and P.S.- Jagdishpur, District- West Champaran at Bettiah. ... ... Petiti...
Read Full Judgment Analysis →undefined INSC 190 • Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)
the letter sent by him is still with the Managing Director, Bihar State Tourism Development Corporation, who is Arbitrator, as per paragraph- 22 of the Agreement, which is extracted hereinbelow:- “22. In case of any difference of opinion in any item of work the issue will be resolved by the Man...
Read Full Judgment Analysis →undefined INSC 740 • Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)
of the Act 2008. Therefore, the Arbitration Tribunal has jurisdiction over the dispute. 9. So far as the submission of the learned Senior Counsel is concerned, the word ‘superstructure’ has no where Patna High Court C.R. No.12 of 2021(11) dt.12-01-2024 8/10 been defined in the Act 2008. ...
Read Full Judgment Analysis →undefined INSC 617 • Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)
(Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI) 418-12-2024In terms of the previous order dated 20.11.2024, the present Miscellaneous Appeal No. 2 of 2023 stands dismissed for non-compliance. manish/- (P. B. Bajanthri, J) ( Ramesh Chand Malviya, J) U...
Read Full Judgment Analysis →undefined INSC 293 • Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.3918 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-375 Year-2023 Thana- RIGA District- Sitamarhi ====================================================== 1.Sanjay Kumar Yadav Son of Rambali Rai R/o vill - Sakraul, ward no. 7, P.S. - Simra, Distt...
Read Full Judgment Analysis →undefined INSC 326 • Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)
on behalf of the respondents has vehemently opposed the very maintainability of the writ petition and stated that the present writ petition is not maintainable as the petitioner has exhausted Patna High Court CWJC No.2247 of 2024(2) dt.26-04-2024 3/5 all the remedies and all the authori...
Read Full Judgment Analysis →