Skip to main content
Citation Index • Supreme Court

Cases Citing Section 323

Statute: Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS)

Jyoti Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 672Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

71% Match

society. Any lapse in execution of the said scheme has to be taken very seriously. Closure of even one day entails the beneficiaries going without their meals, which cannot be overlooked. Thus, we do not find any infirmity in the decision of the authorities cancelling her selection as wel...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Archana Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 350Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

71% Match

authorities shall take action against the petitioner in accordance with law. 6.A counter affidavit is filed on behalf of the State in which he has stated that any degree of Tribhuwan University, Nepal has been declared ‘not valid’ for appointment of regular/Niyojit teachers. All niyojan units were ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Chhotu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 880Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

70% Match

that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. No incriminating material has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The recovery was made Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.5203 of 2024(2) dt.15-02-2024 2/3 from the co-accused, petitioner has no c...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Sanjeev Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 849Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

70% Match

of Sikandra P.S. Case no. 249 of 2022 registered under sections 307, 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 324, 325, 34, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. 3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner and one another are said to have struck Sintu Yadav with a tangi, seriously injuring h...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Upendra Kumar v. Ashok Rai

undefined INSC 702Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

70% Match

दी द एव फ दी स वा बितू त क क स वा स्थि ब वववा ब दत जमदी न पर हलो रह क ब नमर्मा ण कवा यर्य कवा फ लोटलो ग्रवा फ दवा ब खिल ब कयवा गयवा और ब नव क दन ब कयवा गयवा ब क मददवा लहन मदकदमवा कदी जवा नकवा रदी क क Patna High Court C.Misc. No.57 of 2024 dt.02-02-2024 3/4 बिवावजतू न्यवा यवा लय नहदी आकर ब वववा ब...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India (1978) 1 SCC 248

1978 1 SCC 248Supreme Court of India

70% Match

FACTS: Petitioner's passport was impounded without giving reasons. Held: Article 21 procedure must be 'just, fair, and reasonable', not arbitrary or oppressive. Ratio: Expanded Article 21 scope, introducing substantive due process principles into Indian jurisprudence....

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Lalita Kumari v. Government of UP (2013) 2 SCC 1

2013 2 SCC 1Supreme Court of India

70% Match

FACTS: Petition seeking action for police failure to register an FIR for kidnapping. Held: Registration of FIR is mandatory under Section 154 CrPC (now Section 173 BNSS) if the information discloses a cognizable offence. Ratio: No preliminary inquiry is permitted if cognizable offence is disclosed; ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Shahida Khatoon v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 324Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

70% Match

have no criminal antecedent. Learned APP appearing for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for Bail. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the facts and Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.3899 of 2024(3) dt.21-03-2024 3/3 circumstances of the case as well as...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Lilawati Devi, (f), Aged About 21 Years v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 276Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

70% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.4417 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-33 Year-2023 Thana- SIMRI District- Buxar ====================================================== 1.Lilawati Devi, (F), aged about 21 years, Wife of Late Rampravesh Sah, Resident of Village - ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Santosh Kumar Sahu v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 207Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

70% Match

Ram Narayan Mahto, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s: Mr. Anant Kumar 1, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 220-02-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State. 02. In the...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
← Previous PagePage 2Next Page →