Skip to main content
Citation Index • Supreme Court

Cases Citing Section 318

Statute: Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS)

Md. Afaque Ansari v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 755Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

70% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.11360 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-92 Year-2023 Thana- KOTHI District- Gaya ====================================================== 1.Md. Afaque Ansari @ Afak Ansari @ Bechan Miyan @ Md. Afak Ansari S/O Rafique Ansari R/O Villa...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
The Union Of India v. Lalan Kumar

undefined INSC 128Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

70% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.789 of 2018 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.22349 of 2012 ====================================================== 1.The Union Of India through Secretary Cum D.G., department of Post, Bhawan, New Delhi. 2.The Assistant Dire...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →

P.S.- Alamganj, District- Patna, presently posted as Dresser in R.S.B. O.T. No. 5, Patna Medical College and Hospital, Patna. 23.Chandan Kumar S/o Sudama Singh resident of Village- Karma, Post- Karma, Via- Nasriganj, P.S.- Karakat (Gorari), District- Rohtas, presently posted as Dresser in R.S.B. O....

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Sahadev Yadav v. The State Of Bihar Bihar

undefined INSC 163Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

70% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.12308 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-305 Year-2023 Thana- BHAGWANPUR District- Kaimur (Bhabua) ====================================================== Sahadev Yadav @ Sahdev Yadav S/O Jatau Singh Yadav Ro Village- Londa, P.S- Lo...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Sangita Mandal v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 176Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

70% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1113 of 2020 ====================================================== Sangita Mandal Wife of Lakshman Mandal Resident of Nirsa Nagar, P.S. and District- Hatiya (Jharkhand) at present residing in the house of Gopal Kumar, 3LF/4/27...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Sharda Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 394Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

70% Match

ORAL ORDER 213-05-2024 Heard the parties. 2. After some argument, learned counsel for the petitioners submit that he will be approaching the appropriate authority for the redressal of their grievance. 3. Granting the said liberty, the writ petition stands disposed of. Ravi/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Santosh Kumar Sahu v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 692Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

70% Match

are only scratch marks over front and sides of the neck, which falsifies the prosecution story about the informant being assaulted by the petitioners. The petitioners have got no criminal history. 05. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail. 06. Having regard to the fa...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Manish Kumar Mahto v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 422Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

70% Match

under sections 307, 379, 323, 324, 341, 504 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code to which section 302 of the Indian Penal Code was added subsequently. 3. As per the prosecution case, the accused persons including the petitioner herein are said to have come variously armed with lathi, farsa etc. It is st...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Santosh Kumar Sahu v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 796Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

70% Match

tried to forcibly evict the informant from the land in which his buffaloes were grazing and the informant was taking care of that land as caretaker on behalf of some other person. When the informant Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6504 of 2024(2) dt.20-02-2024 2/3 opposed his eviction, the p...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Sithun Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 284Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

70% Match

offences punishable under Sections and 20 (I) (b) / (c) of the N.D.P.S. Act. 3. As per allegation in the FIR, total 3 Kg of ganja recovered in gumti. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that after recovery of the...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
← Previous PagePage 5Next Page →