Skip to main content
Citation Index • Supreme Court

Cases Citing Section 302

Statute: Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS)

Bharat Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 327Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

70% Match

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 222-02-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence under Section 33(1) / 66 of the Indian Forest (Bihar Amendment 1989) Ac...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Manohar Lal v. State

undefined INSC 897Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

70% Match

based on the fact that he is owner of the Truck. It is next submitted that petitioner is a businessman and no prudent businessman would use his own vehicle for committing an occurrence and thus would Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.7339 of 2024(2) dt.22-02-2024 2/2 create evidence against hims...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Sithun Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 109Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

70% Match

offences punishable under Sections and 20 (I) (b) / (c) of the N.D.P.S. Act. 3. As per allegation in the FIR, total 3 Kg of ganja recovered in gumti. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that after recovery of the...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Upendra Kumar v. Ashok Rai

undefined INSC 200Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

70% Match

दी द एव फ दी स वा बितू त क क स वा स्थि ब वववा ब दत जमदी न पर हलो रह क ब नमर्मा ण कवा यर्य कवा फ लोटलो ग्रवा फ दवा ब खिल ब कयवा गयवा और ब नव क दन ब कयवा गयवा ब क मददवा लहन मदकदमवा कदी जवा नकवा रदी क क Patna High Court C.Misc. No.57 of 2024 dt.02-02-2024 3/4 बिवावजतू न्यवा यवा लय नहदी आकर ब वववा ब...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Jyoti Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 196Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

70% Match

the Bidhyapati Mandir, Samastipur, where the marriage was solemnised categorically demonstrates that the marriage of the petitioner with Ajeet Kumar Aryan was solemnised before the cut off date and as Patna High Court CWJC No.426 of 2022 dt.26-11-2024 4/8 such non-selection of the petitioner by tr...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Santosh Kumar Sahu v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 655Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

70% Match

are only scratch marks over front and sides of the neck, which falsifies the prosecution story about the informant being assaulted by the petitioners. The petitioners have got no criminal history. 05. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail. 06. Having regard to the fa...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Shahida Khatoon v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 406Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

70% Match

of the petition. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State. The petitioners have filed the instant application for grant of regular bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 302, 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Allegation against the petitio...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Letters Patent Appeal No.3 of 2022 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10685 of 2019 ====================================================== Vinni Kumari presently residing at Bhawar Pokhar, Behind Khetan Market, P.S. - Pirbahore, district- Patna, Posted as Dre...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Manjit Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 281Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

70% Match

that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner has been made accused Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.3761 of 2024(2) dt.12-02-2024 2/3 in this case only because of the co...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Prabhu Dayal Singh v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 622Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

70% Match

the Indian Penal Code and later on Section 304 of the Indian Penal Code was added. 3. Prosecution case, in short, is that accused persons including this petitioner armed with lathi, danda and pistol assaulted the informant. On hulla, all the accused persons fled away. ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
← Previous PagePage 3Next Page →