Skip to main content
Citation Index • Supreme Court

Cases Citing Section 157

Statute: Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS)

Manohar Lal v. State

undefined INSC 644Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

Biharsharif, Nalanda, where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Excise P.S. Case No. 766 of 2023, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. aditi/- (Satyavrat Verma, J) U T...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →

which was to be based on a platform of 30 ft height. As such, the work performed by the petitioner in pursuance of the contract comes under the definition of ‘work contract’ defined in Section 2(k) of the Act 2008. Therefore, the Arbitration Tribunal has jurisdiction over the disput...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Dipak Kumar Jha v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 332Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1507 of 2017 ====================================================== Dipak Kumar Jha Son of Late Shyam Charan Jha, Grand Son of Late Tara Charan Jha @ Lalan Babu Resident of Village - Mahisi, P.O. and P.S. - Mahisi, ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Sanjeev Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 686Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

him. 4. It is the case of the petitioner that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case. His earlier prayer for bail was rejected vide order dated 19.5.2023 (Annexure-1) passed in Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6702 of 2024(2) dt.02-02-2024 2/2 Cr. Misc. no. 24580 of 2023 giving libert...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Nisha Bharti v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 880Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2438 of 2024 ====================================================== Nisha Bharti Wife of Nagendra Sharma, resident of Village-Naya Tola, Bhalui, P.S.-Chanan, District-Lakhisarai. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1.The State of Bih...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
KS Puttaswamy v. Union of India (2017) 10 SCC 1

2017 10 SCC 1Supreme Court of India

69% Match

FACTS: Challenged Aadhaar biometrics scheme as violating privacy. Held: Right to Privacy is a fundamental right guaranteed under Articles 14, 19, and 21 of the Constitution of India. Ratio: Privacy is intrinsic to life and personal liberty, subject to proportionality tests for state restrictions....

Read Full Judgment Analysis →

W/o Purushottam Das presently residing at - C/o Sitabji, Dariyapur, Mohar Tola, P.S.- Kadamkuan, District- Patna, presently posted as Dresser in Female O.T. (Gayni) Patna Medical College and Hospital, Patna High Court L.P.A No.3 of 2022(4) dt.16-01-2024 2/3 Patna. 13.Madhaw Murari Singh S/o Baban ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Ritu Priya v. Abhishek Kumar Singh

undefined INSC 731Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

(Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI) 418-12-2024In terms of the previous order dated 20.11.2024, the present Miscellaneous Appeal No. 2 of 2023 stands dismissed for non-compliance. manish/- (P. B. Bajanthri, J) ( Ramesh Chand Malviya, J) U...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →

the Bihar State Tourism Development Corporation (Annexure-5). Thereafter, an agreement was entered into between the parties on 29 th August, 2013. The consideration money was fixed as Rs.17.37 crores, Patna High Court C.R. No.12 of 2021(11) dt.12-01-2024 3/10 as per Clause 5 of the agreement. The ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →

Pramod Sah presently residing at C/o Bachchu Rajak, Mohalla- Mahendru, Near Malariya Office, P.S.- Sultanganj, District- Patna, presently posted as Dresser in the Department of Surgical I.C.U. Patna Medical College and Hospital, Patna. 12.Pushpa Rani W/o Purushottam Das presently residing at - C/o ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
← Previous PagePage 4Next Page →