Skip to main content
Business Law Guide

Summary Suit for Recovery of Money under Order 37 CPC

Published on: 15 June 2026 • Reading Time: 4 min

Introduction <a id="introduction"></a>

A summary suit is a legal proceeding under Order 37 of the Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) that enables a plaintiff to recover a debt or liquidated demand from a defendant in a swift and efficient manner. This guide provides an overview of the summary suit procedure, its legal framework, and key takeaways for advocates and clients.

Legal Framework <a id="legal-framework"></a>

Order 37 CPC deals with summary suits, which are instituted for the recovery of a debt or liquidated demand. Section 37 of the CPC states that a summary suit may be instituted in cases where the debt or demand is for a sum of money that is certain or capable of being ascertained with precision. The plaintiff must file a plaint accompanied by an affidavit verifying the cause of action.

The court fees for a summary suit are payable according to the schedule prescribed under the Court Fees Act, 1870. The jurisdiction for filing a summary suit lies with the court that would have jurisdiction to try the suit if it were not a summary suit.

Step-by-Step Legal Procedure <a id="step-by-step-legal-procedure"></a>

To institute a summary suit, the plaintiff must follow these steps:

  • File a plaint accompanied by an affidavit verifying the cause of action
  • Pay the court fees as prescribed under the Court Fees Act, 1870
  • Serve a summons on the defendant, which must be returned to the court within the prescribed timeframe
  • The defendant may file a written statement in response to the summons, but this is not mandatory
  • If the defendant fails to file a written statement or appear in court, the plaintiff may apply for a decree
  • The court may grant a decree if it is satisfied that the plaintiff has a prima facie case and the defendant has no valid defense

> The plaintiff must ensure that the summons is served on the defendant in accordance with the provisions of Order 5 CPC.

Landmark Court Precedents <a id="landmark-court-precedents"></a>

The following Supreme Court cases have laid down important principles regarding summary suits:

  • Kanhayalal v. Sanatan Dharm Sabha (1969) 2 SCC 201: The court held that a summary suit is not a proceeding in a suit, but rather a proceeding to obtain a decree without a suit.
  • Mechelec Engineers Pvt. Ltd. v. Saroj Construction Co. (1987) 3 SCC 471: The court held that a summary suit can be instituted for the recovery of a debt or liquidated demand, but not for the recovery of damages or unliquidated claims.
  • Shiv Kumar Chadha v. M/s Parmanand (1994) 2 SCC 513: The court held that the plaintiff must verify the cause of action by an affidavit, and the court may grant a decree if it is satisfied that the plaintiff has a prima facie case and the defendant has no valid defense.
Key Takeaways <a id="key-takeaways"></a>

Advocates and clients should note the following key takeaways:

  • A summary suit is a swift and efficient way to recover a debt or liquidated demand
  • The plaintiff must file a plaint accompanied by an affidavit verifying the cause of action
  • The defendant may file a written statement in response to the summons, but this is not mandatory
  • The court may grant a decree if it is satisfied that the plaintiff has a prima facie case and the defendant has no valid defense
  • The plaintiff must ensure that the summons is served on the defendant in accordance with the provisions of Order 5 CPC

Some common traps to avoid include:

  • Failing to verify the cause of action by an affidavit
  • Failing to serve the summons on the defendant in accordance with the provisions of Order 5 CPC
  • Failing to apply for a decree if the defendant fails to file a written statement or appear in court

The following are some key documents that must be filed in a summary suit:

  • Plaint
  • Affidavit verifying the cause of action
  • Summons
  • Written statement (if filed by the defendant)
  • Application for decree

The timeline for a summary suit can vary depending on the court and the complexity of the case. However, the following is a general outline of the timeline:

  • Filing of plaint: 1-2 weeks
  • Service of summons: 2-4 weeks
  • Filing of written statement (if any): 2-4 weeks
  • Hearing and decree: 4-8 weeks

In conclusion, a summary suit under Order 37 CPC is a swift and efficient way to recover a debt or liquidated demand. Advocates and clients must ensure that they follow the correct procedure and file the necessary documents to avoid delays and complications.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: What is the purpose of a summary suit under Order 37 CPC?

A: The purpose of a summary suit is to enable a plaintiff to recover a debt or liquidated demand from a defendant in a swift and efficient manner.

Q: What are the requirements for instituting a summary suit?

A: To institute a summary suit, the plaintiff must file a plaint accompanied by an affidavit verifying the cause of action, pay the court fees, and serve a summons on the defendant.

Q: Can a defendant file a written statement in response to a summons in a summary suit?

A: Yes, a defendant may file a written statement in response to a summons in a summary suit, but this is not mandatory.

Q: What is the timeline for a summary suit?

A: The timeline for a summary suit can vary depending on the court and the complexity of the case, but a general outline is: filing of plaint (1-2 weeks), service of summons (2-4 weeks), filing of written statement (if any) (2-4 weeks), and hearing and decree (4-8 weeks).