When the maker or drawer of any bill of exchange, hundi or cheque has placed thereon any signature in token of his having accepted or drawn the same, or when any such bill, hundi or cheque has been altered by erasure, obliteration or otherwise, without the assent of the maker or drawer, the burden of proving that such signature was placed thereon, or that such alteration was made with the assent of the maker or drawer, shall be on the person who asserts the validity of such signature or alteration. When the maker or drawer of any bill of exchange, hundi or cheque has placed thereon any signature in token of his having accepted or drawn the same, the burden of proving that such signature was placed thereon without the assent of the maker or drawer shall be on the person who asserts the invalidity of such signature. When any bill of exchange, hundi or cheque has been altered by erasure, obliteration or otherwise, without the assent of the maker or drawer, the burden of proving that such alteration was made with the assent of the maker or drawer shall be on the person who asserts the validity of such alteration.
परक्राम्य लिखत अधिनियम, 1881 (NI Act)
धारा 146
Presumption as to signature and tenor
Englishहिंदी
⏳
हिंदी अनुवाद जल्द आ रहा है
इस धारा का प्रमाणित हिंदी अनुवाद और कानूनी स्पष्टीकरण वर्तमान में तैयार किया जा रहा है। आप तब तक मूल अंग्रेज़ी पाठ देख सकते हैं।
अंग्रेज़ी में देखें (View in English) →मूल वैधानिक पाठ (Original English Text)
Statutory Content of Section 146
Indian StandardSection 146, Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881
Bluebook (21st ed.)Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, § 146 (India)
Court Pleading StandardSection 146 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881
Canonical Web linkhttps://nyaya.cloud/acts/negotiable-instruments-act-1881/146
Embed this Section Card
Want to display this Section explanation card on your website? Copy and paste the HTML code below:
ऐतिहासिक अदालती निर्णय
धारा 146 से संबंधित महत्वपूर्ण फैसले
सामान्यतः साथ में उद्धृत