Skip to main content
Citation Index • Supreme Court

Cases Citing Section 72

Statute: Transfer of Property Act, 1882 (transfer-of-property-act-1882)

Dipak Kumar Jha v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 691Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

70% Match

the physical feature of Khatiani land of the petitioner appertaining to Khata No. 3515, Khesara No. 1/17711, area 5 acres, 80 Decimals, situated in Mahishi Gram panchayat allegedly in the name of Patna High Court CWJC No.1507 of 2017(4) dt.26-02-2024 2/3 Mahatma Gandhi Rashtriya Rojgar Guara...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →

any of its works relating to construction, repairs or maintenance of any building or superstructure, dam, weir, canal, reservoir, tank, lake, road all types of bridge, culvert, factory or work shops or of such other work of the State Government or, as the case may be, of the public ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →

W/o Purushottam Das presently residing at - C/o Sitabji, Dariyapur, Mohar Tola, P.S.- Kadamkuan, District- Patna, presently posted as Dresser in Female O.T. (Gayni) Patna Medical College and Hospital, Patna High Court L.P.A No.3 of 2022(4) dt.16-01-2024 2/3 Patna. 13.Madhaw Murari Singh S/o Baban ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →

08.10.2013 as well as for payment of 5% of total amount, which was to be paid at the juncture of approval of clay model submitted by the petitioner, as per clause 5(ii) of the Agreement. The said writ application was dismissed and the petitioner then filed LPA No. 494 of 2014, which was disposed of...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Bharat Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 897Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

70% Match

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 222-02-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence under Section 33(1) / 66 of the Indian Forest (Bihar Amendment 1989) Ac...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →

parties ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s: Mr. S.D.Sanjay,Sr. Advodate Mr. Mohit Agarwal Mr. Rahul Kumar Mr.Vishal Kumar Ms. Priya Gupta For the State Mr. Nalin Vilochan Tiwary, AC to GA 9 For BSTDCL Mr. Kumar A...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Sheo Charan Dalmia v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 328Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

70% Match

the property sought to be registered. 19. That the aforesaid proceedings were recorded in Letter no. 6311 dated 24.11.2023 issued by the Additional District Magistrate, Gaya on Letterhead of District Registration Office, Gaya which was addressed to the Municipal Commissioner, Gaya. Patna H...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Rajesh Tewari v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 791Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

70% Match

Brajesh Kumar @ Brajesh Kumar Pandey, Son of Shailendra Kumar Pandey, Resident of Mohalla-Bagmali, P.S.-Town Hajipur, District-Vaishali-844101. ... ... Petitioner. Versus 1.The State of Bihar through the Secretary, Excise Department, Bihar, Patna. 2.The Excise Commissioner, Bihar, Patna. 3.The Dist...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Sheo Charan Dalmia v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 450Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

70% Match

Resident of Mohalla Dalmia House Dhami Tola, K P Road, P.S. Kotwali, Gaya District Gaya that Petitioner no. 1is Presently residing at-402, Smundra Gaurav, Worli Sea Face, Worli Colony, P.S.-Worli, Mumbai, Maharashtra 4.Sheo Arun Dalmia Son of Late Vishwanath Dalmia @ Bishwanath Laxm...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
KS Puttaswamy v. Union of India (2017) 10 SCC 1

2017 10 SCC 1Supreme Court of India

69% Match

FACTS: Challenged Aadhaar biometrics scheme as violating privacy. Held: Right to Privacy is a fundamental right guaranteed under Articles 14, 19, and 21 of the Constitution of India. Ratio: Privacy is intrinsic to life and personal liberty, subject to proportionality tests for state restrictions....

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
← Previous PagePage 2Next Page →