Skip to main content
Citation Index • Supreme Court

Cases Citing Section 131

Statute: Transfer of Property Act, 1882 (transfer-of-property-act-1882)

come under the purview of superstructure, as mentioned in Section 2(k) of the Act, 2008. 12. The Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of M/s Brahmaputra Infrastructure Ltd. (supra), after referring Sections 8, 9 and 22 of the Act 2008 has held in paragraph-5 of the said...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India (1978) 1 SCC 248

1978 1 SCC 248Supreme Court of India

70% Match

FACTS: Petitioner's passport was impounded without giving reasons. Held: Article 21 procedure must be 'just, fair, and reasonable', not arbitrary or oppressive. Ratio: Expanded Article 21 scope, introducing substantive due process principles into Indian jurisprudence....

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Sheo Charan Dalmia v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 112Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

70% Match

petition so that the matter could be taken to its logical conclusion. 6. Learned State counsel as also learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Gaya Municipal Corporation do not have any objection. Patna High Court CWJC No.729 of 2024(2) dt.25-04-2024 4/5 8. Paragraphs 17 to 20 of the petition a...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Bharat Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 751Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

70% Match

petitioners are alleged to have constructed the house over the forest land and thus, caused loss to the Government to the tune of Rs. 10,27,280/-. 4. It is submitted on behalf of petitioners that the Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.11542 of 2024(2) dt.22-02-2024 2/3 place of occurrence i.e. Khata / ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Lalita Kumari v. Government of UP (2013) 2 SCC 1

2013 2 SCC 1Supreme Court of India

70% Match

FACTS: Petition seeking action for police failure to register an FIR for kidnapping. Held: Registration of FIR is mandatory under Section 154 CrPC (now Section 173 BNSS) if the information discloses a cognizable offence. Ratio: No preliminary inquiry is permitted if cognizable offence is disclosed; ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →

Pramod Sah presently residing at C/o Bachchu Rajak, Mohalla- Mahendru, Near Malariya Office, P.S.- Sultanganj, District- Patna, presently posted as Dresser in the Department of Surgical I.C.U. Patna Medical College and Hospital, Patna. 12.Pushpa Rani W/o Purushottam Das presently residing at - C/o ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Archana Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 641Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

70% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1412 of 2020 ====================================================== Archana Kumari Wife of Sri Pawan Kumar Singh, Resident of Village- Jagdishpur, P.O. and P.S.- Jagdishpur, District- West Champaran at Bettiah. ... ... Petiti...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Dipak Kumar Jha v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 197Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

70% Match

the physical feature of Khatiani land of the petitioner appertaining to Khata No. 3515, Khesara No. 1/17711, area 5 acres, 80 Decimals, situated in Mahishi Gram panchayat allegedly in the name of Patna High Court CWJC No.1507 of 2017(4) dt.26-02-2024 2/3 Mahatma Gandhi Rashtriya Rojgar Guara...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →

W/o Purushottam Das presently residing at - C/o Sitabji, Dariyapur, Mohar Tola, P.S.- Kadamkuan, District- Patna, presently posted as Dresser in Female O.T. (Gayni) Patna Medical College and Hospital, Patna High Court L.P.A No.3 of 2022(4) dt.16-01-2024 2/3 Patna. 13.Madhaw Murari Singh S/o Baban ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →

a sand stone statue of Lord Budha having 70 ft height in Bhumi Sparsh posture, on the platform of a height of 30 ft. The learned counsel submitted that as per the Agreement, 30 ft high platform was to be constructed first and thereon the statue of Lord Budha was to be installed. As such, ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
← Previous PagePage 1Next Page →