Skip to main content
Citation Index • Supreme Court

Cases Citing Section 121

Statute: Transfer of Property Act, 1882 (transfer-of-property-act-1882)

come under the purview of superstructure, as mentioned in Section 2(k) of the Act, 2008. 12. The Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of M/s Brahmaputra Infrastructure Ltd. (supra), after referring Sections 8, 9 and 22 of the Act 2008 has held in paragraph-5 of the said...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Bharat Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 584Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

71% Match

petitioners are alleged to have constructed the house over the forest land and thus, caused loss to the Government to the tune of Rs. 10,27,280/-. 4. It is submitted on behalf of petitioners that the Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.11542 of 2024(2) dt.22-02-2024 2/3 place of occurrence i.e. Khata / ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →

a sand stone statue of Lord Budha having 70 ft height in Bhumi Sparsh posture, on the platform of a height of 30 ft. The learned counsel submitted that as per the Agreement, 30 ft high platform was to be constructed first and thereon the statue of Lord Budha was to be installed. As such, ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CIVIL REVISION No.12 of 2021 ====================================================== Rang Vikalp registered office at Studio Variation Artists Studio Sardar Patel Colony, Patliputra Colony Telephone Exchange Road behind SIS Security Office, Kurj...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala (1973) 4 SCC 225

1973 4 SCC 225Supreme Court of India

70% Match

FACTS: Challenged Kerala Land Reforms Act. 13-judge bench reviewed parliament's power to amend the Constitution. Held: Parliament can amend any part of the Constitution, including Fundamental Rights, but cannot alter or destroy the 'Basic Structure' of the Constitution. Ratio: Basic Structure doctri...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India (1978) 1 SCC 248

1978 1 SCC 248Supreme Court of India

70% Match

FACTS: Petitioner's passport was impounded without giving reasons. Held: Article 21 procedure must be 'just, fair, and reasonable', not arbitrary or oppressive. Ratio: Expanded Article 21 scope, introducing substantive due process principles into Indian jurisprudence....

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Upendra Kumar v. Ashok Rai

undefined INSC 878Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

70% Match

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 02-02-2024 The matter has been taken up on mentioning being made on behalf of the petitioner. 2. The petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 23.11.2023 passed by learned Subordinate Judge-I, ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →

Pramod Sah presently residing at C/o Bachchu Rajak, Mohalla- Mahendru, Near Malariya Office, P.S.- Sultanganj, District- Patna, presently posted as Dresser in the Department of Surgical I.C.U. Patna Medical College and Hospital, Patna. 12.Pushpa Rani W/o Purushottam Das presently residing at - C/o ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Dipak Kumar Jha v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 874Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

the physical feature of Khatiani land of the petitioner appertaining to Khata No. 3515, Khesara No. 1/17711, area 5 acres, 80 Decimals, situated in Mahishi Gram panchayat allegedly in the name of Patna High Court CWJC No.1507 of 2017(4) dt.26-02-2024 2/3 Mahatma Gandhi Rashtriya Rojgar Guara...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Dipak Kumar Jha v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 153Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

Mr. Sajid Salim Khan, Advocate Mr. W.A. Khan, AC to SC-25 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 426-02-2024 Heard the parties. 2. The present petition has been preferred for the following reliefs: (i) for issuance...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
← Previous PagePage 1Next Page →