Skip to main content
Citation Index • Supreme Court

Cases Citing Section 109

Statute: Transfer of Property Act, 1882 (transfer-of-property-act-1882)

Kaushal Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 585Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

by which the petitioner has been dismissed from the service and further to reinstate him in service with all consequential benefits. 3.Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the final Patna High Court CWJC No.2681 of 2019 dt.12-02-2024 2/3 order of punishment has been passed by the order ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Gajendra Thakur v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 897Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

1408, 14th Floor, D.B. Ozone Beside Thakur Mall, Near Dahisar Check Naka, Mira Road, P.S. - Kashimira, East Thane Mumbai (401107) 4.Gyan Ranjan Thakur @ Anshu Thakur Son Of Gajendra Thakur Resident Of Village - Rupolia, Panchkadi, P.S. - Dhaka, District - Motihari, At Present Flat No .- 1408, 14th ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Harendra Prasad Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 333Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

petitioner. Therefore, the same has to held as bad, illegal, contrary to the provisions of Rule 27(ii) of the Control Order and has to necessarily set aside. 9. Having regard to the above facts and circumstances and the law laid down by this Hon’ble...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →

P.S.- Alamganj, District- Patna, presently posted as Dresser in R.S.B. O.T. No. 5, Patna Medical College and Hospital, Patna. 23.Chandan Kumar S/o Sudama Singh resident of Village- Karma, Post- Karma, Via- Nasriganj, P.S.- Karakat (Gorari), District- Rohtas, presently posted as Dresser in R.S.B. O....

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Baby Singh v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 356Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1393 of 2024 ====================================================== 1.Baby Singh Wife of Umesh Prasad Singh Resident of Mohalla- Mohanpur, Punaichak, Sundri Bhawan, P.S.- Shashtrinagar, Dist.- Patna. 2.Umesh Prasad Singh, ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Md. Saddam Badshah v. The State Of Bihar Bihar

undefined INSC 476Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

Sadar) issued a letter alleging that Md. Manjar Alam has filed a complaint regarding embezzlement of Rs. 10 lakhs under ‘Mukhyamantri Gramin Payejal Nishchaye Yojna’ of Yojna No. 01/2018-19 in Gram Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6627 of 2024(4) dt.08-05-2024 2/3 Panchayat Daulatpur Ward NO. 10. It ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Jyoti Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 739Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

68% Match

of fact with regard the date of the marriage, the same ought not to be considered while exercising the writ jurisdiction. The petitioner has always been at liberty to approach before the Civil Court of competent jurisdiction to settle the disputed question of fact. 8. This Court has heard the lea...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →

the Bihar State Tourism Development Corporation (Annexure-5). Thereafter, an agreement was entered into between the parties on 29 th August, 2013. The consideration money was fixed as Rs.17.37 crores, Patna High Court C.R. No.12 of 2021(11) dt.12-01-2024 3/10 as per Clause 5 of the agreement. The ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Jyoti Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 314Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

68% Match

society. Any lapse in execution of the said scheme has to be taken very seriously. Closure of even one day entails the beneficiaries going without their meals, which cannot be overlooked. Thus, we do not find any infirmity in the decision of the authorities cancelling her selection as wel...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Jyoti Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 519Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

68% Match

appointment letter and in his place, the respondent no. 8 was selected as Aganwadi Sevika. 4. On the other hand, the respondent no. 8 obtained only 58.60 % marks, much less than the petitioner, who obtained 76% marks, nonetheless her case was placed for consideration and, as such,...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
← Previous PagePage 4Next Page →