Skip to main content
Citation Index • Supreme Court

Cases Citing Section 108

Statute: Transfer of Property Act, 1882 (transfer-of-property-act-1882)

Upendra Kumar v. Ashok Rai

undefined INSC 647Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

construction over the suit property and parties were directed to maintain status quo without hearing the defendant/petitioner. No notice was issued as is reflected from the copy of the order sheet Patna High Court C.Misc. No.57 of 2024 dt.02-02-2024 2/4 attached with the present petition. ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Jagdeo Das v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 340Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

from petitioner and Rs. 13 lacs was paid to the petitioner by the complainant in different installments. It is alleged that thereafter neither the money was returned nor the sale deed was executed. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.5489 of 2024(2) dt.17-02-2024 2/3 4. Learned counsel for the petitione...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →

Mufasil, District- Begusarai, Presently residing at C/O Bhushan Jee, Sakuntala Kunj, Subhakarmana Colony, East Laxminagar, P.S. - Ramkrishna Nagar, Patna presently posted as Dresser in O.T. - 4, Patna Medical College Hospital, Patna. 7.Ajay Kumar Son of Suryabansh Singh presently residing at C/o, M...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Shiv Prasad Raut v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 609Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.973 of 2017 ====================================================== 1.Shiv Prasad Raut and Ors Son of Late Fakan Raut, Resident of Village- Rupaulia, P.O.- Kumhrar, P.S.- Fenhara, District- East Champaran. 2.Chitranjan Rai, 3.S...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Naresh Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar Bihar

undefined INSC 830Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

/ order / direction in the nature of writ of mandamus commanding the respondents to release the land from encroachment, pertaining to Khata No. 100, Plot No. 363, Rakba- 0.10 acres, situated at Mauza- Mohiuddinpur, Thana No. 77, Anchal- Phulwarisarif, District- Patna, which has already been...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Dipak Kumar Jha v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 549Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

Mr. Sajid Salim Khan, Advocate Mr. W.A. Khan, AC to SC-25 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 426-02-2024 Heard the parties. 2. The present petition has been preferred for the following reliefs: (i) for issuance...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Dr. Dharmanand Mishra v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 318Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3028 of 2019 ====================================================== Dr. Dharmanand Mishra S/o Sri Lalan Narayan Mishra, R/o Mohalla Kalwari,New Colony gaya,P.S Civil Line,District Gaya,Principal Nawada Vidhi Mahavidyalaya Naw...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Prem Kumar v. The State Of Bihar Bihar

undefined INSC 310Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

for the petitioner submits that now after compliance of order of this court, the present petition has become infructuous. 3. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. alok/- (Alok Kumar Pandey, J) U T...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Bande Lal Sah v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 499Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

available on record respondent authority issued parcha in favour of Mohan Ram and Bhutai Ram (respondent nos. 7 & 8) allotting a piece of land from the petitioner. He further submits that respondents Mohan Ram and Bhutai Ram filed a petition being Case No.1122M/1994 in the Court of S.D.O., Sadar, P...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Kapil Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 360Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

fulfillment of dowry demand. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is innocent and he has falsely been implicated in the present case. It is further submitted that petitioner is father-in-law of the deceased and he has no concern with the mess a...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
← Previous PagePage 4Next Page →