Skip to main content
Citation Index • Supreme Court

Cases Citing Section 160-1967

Statute: Supreme Court Case Law (supreme-court-case-law)

KS Puttaswamy v. Union of India (2017) 10 SCC 1

2017 10 SCC 1Supreme Court of India

68% Match

FACTS: Challenged Aadhaar biometrics scheme as violating privacy. Held: Right to Privacy is a fundamental right guaranteed under Articles 14, 19, and 21 of the Constitution of India. Ratio: Privacy is intrinsic to life and personal liberty, subject to proportionality tests for state restrictions....

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Amesh Nandan Prasad v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 641Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

68% Match

4. In view of pay-fixation by the Pay Verification Cell of the State Government, the Patna University is directed to pay all consequential benefits as well as arrears to the petitioner according to pay-scale so fixed by the Pay Verification Cell within a period of six months from the date of receip...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →

parties ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s: Mr. S.D.Sanjay,Sr. Advodate Mr. Mohit Agarwal Mr. Rahul Kumar Mr.Vishal Kumar Ms. Priya Gupta For the State Mr. Nalin Vilochan Tiwary, AC to GA 9 For BSTDCL Mr. Kumar A...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Nisha Bharti v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 259Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

68% Match

dated 20.06.2023 in Anganbari Appeal Case No.6/22 by which Collector dismissed the Appeal without hearing the Appellant. (ii) For issuance of a writ in nature of mandamus commanding and directing the Patna High Court CWJC No.2438 of 2024(2) dt.07-03-2024 2/2 respondent Child Development Proj...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →

which was to be based on a platform of 30 ft height. As such, the work performed by the petitioner in pursuance of the contract comes under the definition of ‘work contract’ defined in Section 2(k) of the Act 2008. Therefore, the Arbitration Tribunal has jurisdiction over the disput...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →

the letter sent by him is still with the Managing Director, Bihar State Tourism Development Corporation, who is Arbitrator, as per paragraph- 22 of the Agreement, which is extracted hereinbelow:- “22. In case of any difference of opinion in any item of work the issue will be resolved by the Man...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Harsh Bhushan Thakur v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 514Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

68% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.4784 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-612 Year-2023 Thana- BUXAR District- Buxar ====================================================== Harsh Bhushan Thakur Son of Chandra Bhushan Thakur R/o vill - Tarkanala Main Road Buxar, P.S....

Read Full Judgment Analysis →

Pramod Sah presently residing at C/o Bachchu Rajak, Mohalla- Mahendru, Near Malariya Office, P.S.- Sultanganj, District- Patna, presently posted as Dresser in the Department of Surgical I.C.U. Patna Medical College and Hospital, Patna. 12.Pushpa Rani W/o Purushottam Das presently residing at - C/o ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Md. Afaque Ansari v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 459Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

68% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.11360 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-92 Year-2023 Thana- KOTHI District- Gaya ====================================================== 1.Md. Afaque Ansari @ Afak Ansari @ Bechan Miyan @ Md. Afak Ansari S/O Rafique Ansari R/O Villa...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Mukesh Kumar Mandal v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 668Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

68% Match

some extent so that the petitioner can make payment of the maintenance allowance. 5. I have perused the materials on record. The opposite party in her evidence admitted in cross-examination that the Patna High Court CR. REV. No.148 of 2019 dt.24-04-2024 3/4 petitioner is a day labourer. There is o...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
← Previous PagePage 3Next Page →