Skip to main content
Citation Index • Supreme Court

Cases Citing Section 157-1962

Statute: Supreme Court Case Law (supreme-court-case-law)

Mukesh Kumar Mandal v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 501Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

68% Match

some extent so that the petitioner can make payment of the maintenance allowance. 5. I have perused the materials on record. The opposite party in her evidence admitted in cross-examination that the Patna High Court CR. REV. No.148 of 2019 dt.24-04-2024 3/4 petitioner is a day labourer. There is o...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Sangita Mandal v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 312Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

68% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1113 of 2020 ====================================================== Sangita Mandal Wife of Lakshman Mandal Resident of Nirsa Nagar, P.S. and District- Hatiya (Jharkhand) at present residing in the house of Gopal Kumar, 3LF/4/27...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →

parties ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s: Mr. S.D.Sanjay,Sr. Advodate Mr. Mohit Agarwal Mr. Rahul Kumar Mr.Vishal Kumar Ms. Priya Gupta For the State Mr. Nalin Vilochan Tiwary, AC to GA 9 For BSTDCL Mr. Kumar A...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar (2014) 8 SCC 273

2014 8 SCC 273Supreme Court of India

68% Match

FACTS: Anticipatory bail application in a Section 498A IPC cruelty case. Held: Arrest should not be the default action in offences carrying punishment of less than 7 years. Ratio: Police must comply with Section 41A CrPC (now Section 35 BNSS) notice guidelines before executing arrest....

Read Full Judgment Analysis →

a sand stone statue of Lord Budha having 70 ft height in Bhumi Sparsh posture, on the platform of a height of 30 ft. The learned counsel submitted that as per the Agreement, 30 ft high platform was to be constructed first and thereon the statue of Lord Budha was to be installed. As such, ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Nisha Bharti v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 130Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

68% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2438 of 2024 ====================================================== Nisha Bharti Wife of Nagendra Sharma, resident of Village-Naya Tola, Bhalui, P.S.-Chanan, District-Lakhisarai. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1.The State of Bih...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Gajendra Thakur v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 418Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

68% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.5021 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-5645 Year-2022 Thana- PATNA COMPLAINT CASE District- Patna ====================================================== 1.Gajendra Thakur Son Of Late Devnath Thakur Resident Of Village - Rupolia, Pa...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Dipak Kumar Jha v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 169Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

68% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1507 of 2017 ====================================================== Dipak Kumar Jha Son of Late Shyam Charan Jha, Grand Son of Late Tara Charan Jha @ Lalan Babu Resident of Village - Mahisi, P.O. and P.S. - Mahisi, ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Amesh Nandan Prasad v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 419Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

68% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.627 of 2022 ====================================================== Amesh Nandan Prasad Son of Late Deoki Nandan Prasad Resident of Village and P.S.- Daniawan, Dist.- Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1.The State of Bihar Thr...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Amesh Nandan Prasad v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 860Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

68% Match

4. In view of pay-fixation by the Pay Verification Cell of the State Government, the Patna University is directed to pay all consequential benefits as well as arrears to the petitioner according to pay-scale so fixed by the Pay Verification Cell within a period of six months from the date of receip...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
← Previous PagePage 3Next Page →