Skip to main content
Citation Index • Supreme Court

Cases Citing Section 41

Statute: Stamp Act, 1899 (stamp-act-1899)

Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar (2014) 8 SCC 273

2014 8 SCC 273Supreme Court of India

68% Match

FACTS: Anticipatory bail application in a Section 498A IPC cruelty case. Held: Arrest should not be the default action in offences carrying punishment of less than 7 years. Ratio: Police must comply with Section 41A CrPC (now Section 35 BNSS) notice guidelines before executing arrest....

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Kumar Pushpak v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 858Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

68% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.4141 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-765 Year-2023 Thana- PATRAKARNAGAR District- Patna ====================================================== Kumar Pushpak S/O Late Parmeshwer Prasad R/O Villag- Ruidhasa, Kali Mandir, P.S And Di...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →

Pramod Sah presently residing at C/o Bachchu Rajak, Mohalla- Mahendru, Near Malariya Office, P.S.- Sultanganj, District- Patna, presently posted as Dresser in the Department of Surgical I.C.U. Patna Medical College and Hospital, Patna. 12.Pushpa Rani W/o Purushottam Das presently residing at - C/o ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Krishnadeo Poddar v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 712Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

68% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.10 of 2020 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12370 of 2015 ====================================================== Krishnadeo Poddar Son of Late Sitabi Poddar, Retired Head Electrician, Muzaffapur Electric Supply Circle, res...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →

in holding that it has no jurisdiction to decide the matter. Undisputedly, the authority mentioned in paragraph-22 of the Agreement has only jurisdiction over the subject matter of the contract. 14. The revision application is accordingly dismissed. 15. As it has already been submitted that the ma...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Rajesh Tewari v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 861Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

68% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1022 of 2021 ====================================================== Rajesh Tewari Son of Srinath Tiwari Resident of 3, Dilkhush Street, Opposite Circus Avenue S.O. Circus Avenue, Kolkata, West Bengal-700017. ... ... Petitione...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Sita Ram Singh v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 804Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

68% Match

Sita Ram Yadav ( GP-16 ) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIBEK CHAUDHURI ORAL ORDER 410-09-2024The petitioners was a daily wage employee in Minor Irrigation Department in the District of Katihar. His service was terminated by an order dated 09.03...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →

Mufasil, District- Begusarai, Presently residing at C/O Bhushan Jee, Sakuntala Kunj, Subhakarmana Colony, East Laxminagar, P.S. - Ramkrishna Nagar, Patna presently posted as Dresser in O.T. - 4, Patna Medical College Hospital, Patna. 7.Ajay Kumar Son of Suryabansh Singh presently residing at C/o, M...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Yogendra Prasad v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 848Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

68% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.5 of 2023 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6732 of 2017 ====================================================== Yogendra Prasad son of late Rameshwar Prasad Singh, resident of Village Makhdumpur, Police Station- Ekangarsara...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Sita Ram Singh v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 863Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

68% Match

period starting from the Month of April, 2020 to 22.07.2021 and also from April 2004 to March 2005, as well as post retiral benefit, if any. On this prayer, the petitioner has prayed for issuance of a Patna High Court CWJC No.414 of 2022(4) dt.10-09-2024 2/3 writ of mandamus against the respondent...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
← Previous PagePage 3Next Page →