Skip to main content
Citation Index • Supreme Court

Cases Citing Section 3

Statute: Stamp Act, 1899 (stamp-act-1899)

Kaushal Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 535Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

68% Match

by which the petitioner has been dismissed from the service and further to reinstate him in service with all consequential benefits. 3.Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the final Patna High Court CWJC No.2681 of 2019 dt.12-02-2024 2/3 order of punishment has been passed by the order ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →

which was to be based on a platform of 30 ft height. As such, the work performed by the petitioner in pursuance of the contract comes under the definition of ‘work contract’ defined in Section 2(k) of the Act 2008. Therefore, the Arbitration Tribunal has jurisdiction over the disput...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →

petitioner submitted clay model of statue of Lord Budha in Bhumi Sparsh posture which was approved by the respondents, amongst other bidders. The petitioner also became successful in a financial bid and thereafter work order was issued to him, vide letter no. 487 dated 14.08.2013, issued by...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →

of Prasad Bhawan, East Ram Krishna Nagar, Patna, presently posted as Dresser in O.T.- 1, Patna Medical College and Hospital, Patna. 18.Putul Kumari D/o Ramadhar Manjhi resident of Telpa House, Bhawar Pokhar, Vijay Gopal Banarge Path, P.S.- Pirbahore, District- Patna, presently posted as Dresser in ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Jyoti Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 566Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

68% Match

question of fact with regard the date of the marriage of the petitioner, which otherwise also, can not be determined without taking evidences. 9. So far the post of Aganwadi Sevika is concerned, it is a post created under the scheme and not holding any civil post, thus no prot...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Krishnadeo Poddar v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 677Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

68% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.10 of 2020 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12370 of 2015 ====================================================== Krishnadeo Poddar Son of Late Sitabi Poddar, Retired Head Electrician, Muzaffapur Electric Supply Circle, res...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Jyoti Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 649Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

68% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.426 of 2022 ====================================================== Jyoti Kumari W/o Ajeet Kumar Aryan R/v- Paharpur, Ward No- 9, Gram Panchayat Alampur Kodaria, P.S.- Bibhutipur, Dist- Samastipur. ... ... ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Jyoti Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 406Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

68% Match

of fact with regard the date of the marriage, the same ought not to be considered while exercising the writ jurisdiction. The petitioner has always been at liberty to approach before the Civil Court of competent jurisdiction to settle the disputed question of fact. 8. This Court has heard the lea...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →

parties ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s: Mr. S.D.Sanjay,Sr. Advodate Mr. Mohit Agarwal Mr. Rahul Kumar Mr.Vishal Kumar Ms. Priya Gupta For the State Mr. Nalin Vilochan Tiwary, AC to GA 9 For BSTDCL Mr. Kumar A...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Archana Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 421Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

68% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1412 of 2020 ====================================================== Archana Kumari Wife of Sri Pawan Kumar Singh, Resident of Village- Jagdishpur, P.O. and P.S.- Jagdishpur, District- West Champaran at Bettiah. ... ... Petiti...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
← Previous PagePage 4Next Page →