Skip to main content
Citation Index • Supreme Court

Cases Citing Section 13

Statute: Stamp Act, 1899 (stamp-act-1899)

Mufasil, District- Begusarai, Presently residing at C/O Bhushan Jee, Sakuntala Kunj, Subhakarmana Colony, East Laxminagar, P.S. - Ramkrishna Nagar, Patna presently posted as Dresser in O.T. - 4, Patna Medical College Hospital, Patna. 7.Ajay Kumar Son of Suryabansh Singh presently residing at C/o, M...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →

the letter sent by him is still with the Managing Director, Bihar State Tourism Development Corporation, who is Arbitrator, as per paragraph- 22 of the Agreement, which is extracted hereinbelow:- “22. In case of any difference of opinion in any item of work the issue will be resolved by the Man...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →

petitioner submitted clay model of statue of Lord Budha in Bhumi Sparsh posture which was approved by the respondents, amongst other bidders. The petitioner also became successful in a financial bid and thereafter work order was issued to him, vide letter no. 487 dated 14.08.2013, issued by...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →

P.S.- Alamganj, District- Patna, presently posted as Dresser in R.S.B. O.T. No. 5, Patna Medical College and Hospital, Patna. 23.Chandan Kumar S/o Sudama Singh resident of Village- Karma, Post- Karma, Via- Nasriganj, P.S.- Karakat (Gorari), District- Rohtas, presently posted as Dresser in R.S.B. O....

Read Full Judgment Analysis →

but a ‘superstructure’ erected/installed on the platform of 30 ft height and the statue encompasses the word ‘superstructure’ mentioned in Section 2(k) of the Act 2008. The learned counsel next Patna High Court C.R. No.12 of 2021(11) dt.12-01-2024 5/10 submitted that, as per Clause 5(ii) of the Ag...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →

which was to be based on a platform of 30 ft height. As such, the work performed by the petitioner in pursuance of the contract comes under the definition of ‘work contract’ defined in Section 2(k) of the Act 2008. Therefore, the Arbitration Tribunal has jurisdiction over the disput...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Jyoti Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 344Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

68% Match

appointment letter and in his place, the respondent no. 8 was selected as Aganwadi Sevika. 4. On the other hand, the respondent no. 8 obtained only 58.60 % marks, much less than the petitioner, who obtained 76% marks, nonetheless her case was placed for consideration and, as such,...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Jyoti Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 788Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

68% Match

of fact with regard the date of the marriage, the same ought not to be considered while exercising the writ jurisdiction. The petitioner has always been at liberty to approach before the Civil Court of competent jurisdiction to settle the disputed question of fact. 8. This Court has heard the lea...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Shiv Prasad Raut v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 403Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

68% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.973 of 2017 ====================================================== 1.Shiv Prasad Raut and Ors Son of Late Fakan Raut, Resident of Village- Rupaulia, P.O.- Kumhrar, P.S.- Fenhara, District- East Champaran. 2.Chitranjan Rai, 3.S...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Manoj Kumar v. Mr. Amir Subhani, The Chief Secretary, Govt. Of Bihar, Patna

undefined INSC 893Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

68% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.125 of 2024 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2484 of 2020 ====================================================== Manoj Kumar, Son of Late Jagdish Rai, Resident of Dharmi Raman Kutir, D.V.C. Road, Yarpur, P.S.- Gardanibagh,...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
← Previous PagePage 3Next Page →